Evidence of Validity for the Hierarchical Job Crafting Scale in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3313Keywords:
factor analysis, psychological assessment, psychometry, workersAbstract
Job crafting is characterized by worker’s proactive behavior aiming to give meaning and significance to their work relations, allowing the individual to assume a leading role by acting as an agent of change. The study aimed to gather evidence of validity for the Job Crafting Hierarchical Scale in Brazil. Study sample consisted of 675 Brazilian workers of both genders, aged between 18 and 82 years. Confirmatory Factor Analysis pointed out that the 18-item model, divided into four reflective factors (increase in resources, increase in challenging demands, reduction in demands, and optimization of demands) and one formative factor (job crafting) presented the best adjustment indexes. Results showed a positive correlation with work engagement and a negative correlation with work exhaustion. In conclusion, the instrument presented psychometric properties that recommend its use in future investigations on job crafting.
Downloads
References
Bakker, A. B. (2015). Top-down and bottom-up interventions to increase work engagement. In P. J. Hartung, M. L. Savickas, & B. W. Walsh (Eds.), APA handbook of career intervention: Vol. 2. Applications (pp. 427-438). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14439-031
Carlotto, M. S., & Câmara, S. G. (2007). Preditores da síndrome de Burnout em professores [Predictors of Burnout Syndrome in teachers]. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 11(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572007000100010
Chinelato, R. S. C., Ferreira, M. C., & Valentini, F. (2015). Evidence of validity of the Job Crafting Behaviors Scale. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 25(62), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201506
Concolatto, C. P., Rodrigues, T. G., & Oltramari, A. P. (2017). Mudanças nas relações de trabalho e o papel simbólico do trabalho na atualidade [Changes in work relations and the symbolic role of work today]. Farol: Revista de Estudos Organizacionais e Sociedade, 4(09), 340-389. https://revistas.face.ufmg.br/index.php/farol/article/view/3254
Costantini, A., Demerouti, E., Ceschi, A., & Sartori, R. (2019). Evidence on the hierarchical, multidimensional nature of behavioural job crafting. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 311-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12232
Devotto, R. P., & Machado, W. L. (2017). Job crafting: Uma revisão da produção científica internacional [Job Crafting: A review of international scientific production]. Psico-USF, 22(3), 413-423. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712017220303
Devotto, R. P., & Machado, W. L. (2020). Evidências de validade da versão brasileira do Job Crafting Questionnaire [Validity evidences of the Brazilian version of the Job Crafting Questionnaire]. Psico-USF, 25(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712020250104
Ferreira, M. C., Valentini, F., Damásio, B. F., Mourão, L., Porto, J. B., Chinelato, R. S. C., Novaes, V. P., & Pereira, M. M. (2016). Evidências adicionais de validade da UWES-9 em amostras brasileiras [Additional validity evidences of UWES-9 in Brazilian samples]. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 21(4), 435-445. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20160042
Fischer, R., & Karl, J. A. (2019). A primer to (Cross-Cultural) multi-group invariance testing possibilities in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507
Gennaro, D. (2019). Job crafting: The art of redesigning a job. Emerald.
Grégoire, J. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Evaluation of Formative Measurement Models. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_5
Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Different types of employee well-being across time and their relationships with job crafting. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000081
Hauck-Filho, N., & Valentini, F. (2020). Coeficientes de fidedignidade e violações dos pressupostos essencialmente tau-equivalentes [Reliability coefficients and violations of essentially tau-equivalent assumptions]. Avaliação Psicológica, 19(3), a-b. https://dx.doi.org/10.15689/ap.2020.1903.ed
Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219871976
Moura, J. S., Ribeiro, J. C. O. A., Castro Neta, A. A., & Nunes, C. P. (2019). A precarização do trabalho docente e o adoecimento mental no contexto neoliberal [The precariousness of teaching work and mental illness in the neoliberal context]. Revista Profissão Docente, 19(40), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.31496/rpd.v19i40.1242
Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012). Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1120-1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1783
Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta‐ analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008
Schaufeli, W. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556
Schwartz, Y., Duc, M., & Durrive, L. (2021). Trabalho e uso de si. In Y. Schwartz & L. Durrive (Orgs.), Work and ergology: conversations about human activity (3a ed., pp. 191-206). EdUFF.
Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The Job Crafting Questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v3i2.1
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009
Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378011
Zhang, F., & Parker, S. K. (2019). Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 126-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2332
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Regarding the availability of contents, Paideia adopts the Creative Commons License, CC-BY. With this licence anyone is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as to remix, transform, and create from the material for any purpose, even commercial, giving the proper copyright credits to the journal, providing a link to the licence and indicating if changes have been made.
Partial reproduction of other publications
Quotations of more than 500 words, reproductions of one or more figures, tables or other illustrations must have written permission from the copyright holder of the original work for the reproduction specified in the Paidéia journal. Permission should be addressed to the author of the submitted manuscript. Secondarily obtained rights will not be transferred under any circumstance.
