Evaluation of three radiographic methods (conventional periapical, digital periapical and panoramic) in the diagnosis of artificially produced periapical lesions

Authors

  • Solange Maria de ALMEIDA Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba
  • Frab Norberto BÓSCOLO Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba
  • Francisco HAITER NETO Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba
  • Júlio César Bento dos SANTOS Faculdade de Odontologia de Montes Claros

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912001000100011

Keywords:

Periapical abscess, Radiographic image enhancement, Radiography^i1^spanora, Radiography^i1^sden

Abstract

This research was carried out in order to evaluate three radiographic methods - conventional periapical, digital periapical and panoramic - in the diagnosis of artificially produced periapical lesions. For this purpose, 5 mandibles, with lesions produced by means of spherical drills of different sizes, were used. The research was divided into five distinct phases, as follows: phase Z (initial) - characterized by the absence of lesion; phase R - lesion produced with a number 6 drill; phase J - lesion produced with a number 8 drill; phase D - lesion produced with a number 10 drill; and phase H - lesion reaching the vestibular cortex. The lesions were produced in quadrants. Radiographs were made after each phase and analyzed by 4 experts in radiology. For the digital system there was statistically significant difference in phase R (in the region of incisors) and in phase H (in the region of premolars). In the region of molars there was statistically significant difference in phase D for panoramic radiography. It must be pointed out that panoramic radiography produced the less effective results in phase H.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2001-03-01

Issue

Section

Radiologia

How to Cite

Evaluation of three radiographic methods (conventional periapical, digital periapical and panoramic) in the diagnosis of artificially produced periapical lesions. (2001). Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira, 15(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912001000100011