The role of radiology in forensic dentistry

Authors

  • Jonas GRUBER Universidade de São Paulo; Instituto de Química; Departamento de Química Fundamental
  • Marta Maria KAMEYAMA Universidade de São Paulo; Instituto de Química; Departamento de Química Fundamental

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912001000300014

Keywords:

Radiology, Forensic dentistry, Age determination by teeth

Abstract

There are various methods for the identification of human remains; most of them are based on comparisons between available ante- and post-mortem data. Although fingerprinting is the most accurate and precise method, in many cases, such as in mutilated, decomposed, burned or fragmented bodies, it cannot be used, and the dental methods become of the utmost importance, since teeth and dental restorations are very resistant to destruction by fire - they keep numerous characteristics, which are quite unique, and offer the possibility of accurate and legally acceptable identification of remains. This brief review describes the progress of forensic dentistry during the last 25 years, regarding the procedures and techniques that use ante-mortem and post-mortem radiographs. Among the discussed progresses one can point out: a specially designed self-supporting film holder that retains intra-oral films in the mouths of deceased persons whose mandibular musculature has been fixed in rigor mortis; positioning devices suitable for reproducing the geometry of ante-mortem radiographic images; methods involving digital radiographs, which can be easily stored in a central archive, retrieved and transmitted, via modem, to mass casualty sites; age estimation procedures; identification of edentulous individuals comparing radiographs of the maxilla; and studies of validation of dental radiographs taken with ante-mortem and post-mortem intervals of up to 30 years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2001-09-01

Issue

Section

Artigo de Divulgação

How to Cite

The role of radiology in forensic dentistry. (2001). Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira, 15(3), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912001000300014