Design expertise: how knowledge, experience, and skills set expert architects apart from novices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-2762.v20i34p60-81Keywords:
Design cognition. Expertise. Sketch. Knowledge. Ability. Architects (practice)Abstract
The analysis of the design process under the cognitive theory proposes an understanding of internal mental processes, based on the processing of information derived from the knowledge, experience, and skills of the architect. Although it is difficult to trace the sources of the architects’ thoughts, the drawings they produce facilitate the identification of the successive approaches used during the design process. Since cognition, or the act of thinking, itself cannot be observed, we can only analyze the results of the thought that guided cognitive actions. The steps of the research conducted by the authors of this article were as follows: 1) three experienced architects and three novices were filmed individually, for 60 minutes, while they carried out a project; 2) these professionals were interviewed for 30 minutes after the end of the project; 3) physical, perceptual, functional, and conceptual cognitive actions were identified by segmenting and codifying the actions performed during the filming; 4) these data were translated into graphs; 5) the differences between novices and experts were identified from the response time in each of the four levels of cognitive actions; and 6) the qualitative analysis of actions and effectiveness were assessed. Experienced architects quickly recovered from their memory-specific knowledge and, based on scant evidence, select, combine, and generate different ideas during the design process. They can do so because the knowledge encoded in typical situations enables them to make faster and better supported decisions. Expertise is the human faculty that allows performance of cognitive operations that involve daily thinking and doing with quality, speed, and vitality. An expert is someone who performs a task significantly better than most other people do. We concluded that expert architects perform projects with greater ease than beginners, not only because they have more knowledge and experience, but also because they use cognitive actions more effectively. This paper contributes to the discussion on the design practice and the factors that contribute to the expertise development in architecture.Downloads
References
AKIN, Ömer. Psychology of architectural design. London: Pion Limited, 1986. 196 p.
ANDERSON, John R. Cognitive Psychology and its implications. 6thed. New York: Worth Publishers, 2005. 519 p.
CASAKIN, Hernan; GOLDSMITH, Gabriela. Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education. Design Studies, v. 20, n. 2, p. 153–175, 1999.
CHI, Michelene T. H.; GLASER, Robert; FARR, Marshall J. (Ed.). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988. 472 p.
ERICSSON, Karl A.; SMITH, Jacqui. (Ed.). Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 344 p.
ERICSSON, Karl. A.; SIMON, Herbert. A. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. 443 p.
HITCHCOCK, Henry-Russell. The evolution of wright. Mies & Le Corbusier. Perspecta, v. 1, p. 8-15, 1952.
KAVAKLI, Manolya et.al. Sketching interpretation in novice and expert designers. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VISUAL & SPATIAL REASONING IN DESIGN, 1999. Proceedings... Cambridge: MIT, 1999, p. 209-2119.
KAVAKLI, Manolya; GERO John. Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, v. 22, n. 4, p. 347–364, 2001a.
KAVAKLI, Manolya; GERO John. Strategic knowledge differences between an expert and a novice. In: STRATEGIC KNOWLEDGE AND CONCEPT FORMATION, 3., 2001. Proceedings … GERO, John S. and HORI, K. (Ed.). Sidney: University of Sydney, 2001b, p. 55-68.
LAWSON, Bryan. How designers think. London: The Architectural Press, 1983. 318 p.
LAWSON, Bryan; DORST, Kees. Design expertise. Oxford: Architectural Press; Elsevier, 2009. 321 p.
MAHFUZ, Edson da C. Ensaio sobre a razão CoObrigadampositiva. Viçosa, Belo Horizonte: AP Cultural, 1995. 176 p.
NEWELL, Allen; SIMON, Herbert A. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972. 920 p.
OXMAN, Rivka. Prior Knowledge in design: a dynamic knowledge-based model of design and creativity. Design Studies, v. 11, n. 1, p. 17-27, 1990.
OXMAN, Rivka.. Precedents in design: a computational model for the organization of precedent knowledge. Design Studies, v. 15, n. 2, p. 141-157, 1994.
OXMAN, Rivka; OXMAN, Robert M. Refinement and adaptation in design cognition. Design Studies, v. 13, n. 2, p. 117-134, 1992.
PATON, Bec; DORST, Kees. Briefing and reframing: a situated practice. Design Studies, v. 32, n. 6, p. 573-589, 2011.
SCHÖN, Donald. Educando o profissional reflexivo: um novo design para o ensino e a aprendizagem. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas Sul, 2000. 256 p.
SIMON, Herbert A. The sciences of the artificial. 3rd ed. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1996. 231 p.
SIMON, Herbert A. Structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, v. 4, p. 181-201, 1972.
SIMON, Herbert A. Invariants of Human Behavior. Annual Review Psychology, v. 41, p. 1-20, 1990. SUWA, Masaki; PURCELL, Terry; GERO, John. Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a Scheme for Coding Designers’ Cognitive Actions. Design Studies, v. 19, n. 4, p. 455-483, 1998.
SUWA, Masaki; TVERSKY, Barbara. What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, v. 18, n. 4, p. 385-403, 1997.
WEISBERG, Robert W. Creativity: understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. 640 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
DIADORIM - Diretório de Políticas Editoriais







