Domestic actors and regional integration: Argentine perceptions of the 2030 Agenda in Mercosur

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1676-6288.bjlas.2026.247351

Keywords:

2030 Agenda, Mercosur, Regional integration, Argentine elites, Brazilian Foreign Policy

Abstract

This article analyzes the incorporation of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to the environmental dimension within Mercosur. The central premise is that the degree of institutionalization and the legitimacy of regional bodies directly influence the effectiveness of environmental governance. The research adopted a qualitative-interpretive approach, combining documentary analysis with ten semi-structured interviews conducted in Buenos Aires with actors from the diplomatic, parliamentary, productive, and academic sectors. The results reveal that the incorporation of the SDGs into the bloc’s decision-making processes is predominantly generic and poorly articulated with coordinated actions, thereby constituting a discursive practice that translates social demands into primarily state-led agendas. The findings indicate that, while SDG 15 (Life on Land) has greater technical centrality, issues related to Climate Action (SDG 13) are characterized by fluctuating commitments. Productive sectors, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), report “participatory fatigue” (REED, 2008) and a sense of exclusion from decision-making centers, in addition to identifying the environmental requirements associated with the Mercosur–European Union Agreement as potential non-tariff barriers. The study concludes that, although the resumption of Brazilian leadership is regarded as decisive for the governance of the bloc, China’s growing influence and domestic political instability in Argentina pose structural challenges to the consolidation of a regional sustainable development agenda.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Regiane Nitsch Bressan, Federal University of São Paulo

    Professora Associada do Departamento de Relações Internacionais da Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). Docente do Programa Interinstitucional de Pós-Graduação em Relações Internacionais San Tiago Dantas (UNESP/UNICAMP/PUC-SP). Bolsista de Produtividade em Pesquisa do CNPq. Doutora em Integração da América Latina pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP).E-mail: regianebressan@unifesp.br

     

References

Agência Senado. Mercosul adota estratégia comum de biodiversidade. Agência Senado, Brasília, 29 mar. 2006. Disponível em: https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2006/03/29/mercosul-adota-estrategia-comum-de-biodiversidade. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2026.

BRESSAN, Regiane Nitsch. A integração sul-americana e a superação da pobreza: uma abordagem pela percepção das elites. 2012. Tese (Doutorado em Integração da América Latina) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/T.84.2012.tde-18122012-104158.

BRESSAN, Regiane Nitsch. Ameaça global do Brasil: a governança regional para amazônia. In: ENCONTRO DA ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA EM RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS, 8., 2021, São Paulo. Anais [...]. São Paulo: ABRI, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.encontro2021.abri.org.br/trabalho/view?ID_TRABALHO=5606. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2026.

BRESSAN, Regiane Nitsch. The Southern Cone, environmental governance and the SDGs: Mercosur and the environment. Policy Paper 8. Bonn: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.kas.de/documents/273477/22595279/POLICY+PAPER+8+-+ENG.pdf. Acesso em: 08 jan. 2026.

BRESSAN, Regiane Nitsch; GARCIA, Tatiana de Souza Leite. Mercosur and Environment: Progress in Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, Brasília, v. 66, n. 2, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202300217

FREITAS JÚNIOR, Antônio Jorge Rodrigues de. Considerações acerca do direito ambiental do Mercosul. Revista Jus Navigandi, Teresina, v. 8, n. 136, jul. 2003. Disponível em: https://jus.com.br/artigos/4448/consideracoes-acerca-do-direito-ambiental-do-mercosul. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2026.

GONZÁLEZ, Luis Eduardo; ACHARD, Diego; FLORES SILVA, Manuel. Las élites y el Mercosur. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, n. 10, pp. 62-66, 1994. Disponível em: https://www.colibri.udelar.edu.uy/jspui/handle/20.500.12008/27596. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2026.

HAAS, Peter M. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, Cambridge, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1–35, 1992 . Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706951. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2026.

JENNE, Nicole; SCHENONI, Luis L.; URDINEZ, Francisco. Of words and deeds: Latin American declaratory regionalism, 1994–2014. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Cambridge, v. 30, n. 2-3, p. 195–215, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2017.1383358.

LUCIANO, Bruno Theodoro; BRESSAN, Regiane Nitsch; SALLES, Mariana Medeiros. 2030 Agenda in Mercosur's internal and external agenda: constraints, complementarities and challenges. In: SOARES, Samuel Alves (org.). Transformations in international politics, conflicts, regionalism and Latin America. São Paulo: Universidade Estadual Paulista, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9786559545599.0007.

MANNERS, Ian. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?. Journal of Common Market Studies, Oxford, v. 40, n. 2, p. 235–258, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353.

MCGANN, James G. The Fifth Estate: Think Tanks, Public Policy, and Governance. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt1gpccjc. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2026.

MALAMUD, Andrés; GARDINI, Gian Luca. Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and its Lessons. The International Spectator, Roma, v. 47, n. 1, p. 116–133, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2012.655013

MARIANO, Karina; BRESSAN, Regina N; LUCIANO, Bruno T. Liquid regionalism: A typology for regionalism in the Americas. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional (RBPI), v. 64, n. 2, 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202100204.

MARIANO, Karina; BRESSAN, R. N; LUCIANO, B. T. (Eds.). Liquid Regionalism in the Americas: An Analysis of Contemporary Regional Developments. Cham: Springer, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.70040

MERCOSUL. (Argentina; Brasil; Paraguay; Uruguay; Venezuela). Tratado para la constitución de un Mercado Común (Tratado de Asunción). Montevideo: Mercosul, 1991. Disponível em: https://www.mercosur.int/pt-br/documentos-e-normativa/tratados/. Acesso em: 06 mar. 2026.

MERCOSUL. (Argentina; Brasil; Paraguay; Uruguay). A temática ambiental no Mercosul: evolução e perspectivas. In: REUNIÃO DE MINISTROS DO MEIO AMBIENTE DO MERCOSUL, 9., 2008, Rio de Janeiro. Anais [...]. Rio de Janeiro: Mercosul, 2008.

MERCOSUL. (Argentina; Brasil; Paraguay; Uruguay). Objetivos del desarrollo sostenible en Mercosur. In: REUNIÓN DEL FORO DE CONSULTA Y CONCERTACIÓN POLÍTICA DEL MERCOSUR, 91., 2019, Buenos Aires. Anais [...]. Buenos Aires: Mercosul, 2019.

MERCOSUL. (Argentina; Brasil; Paraguay; Uruguay). Implementación de la Agenda 2030 en los países del Mercosur. Montevideo: Mercosul, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/implementacion_ods_mercosur_2.pdf. Acesso em: 03 mar. 2026.

MERCOSUL. (Argentina; Brasil; Paraguay; Uruguay). Ata da 71ª Reunião Ordinária do Subgrupo de Trabalho n. 06 “Medio Ambiente”. Montevideo: Mercosul, 2021. Disponível em: https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/86773_SGT6_2021_ACTA03_PT.pdf. Acesso em: 07 mar. 2026.

MERCOSUL. (Argentina; Brasil; Paraguay; Uruguay). Ata de 72ª Reunião Ordinária do Subgrupo de Trabalho n. 06 “Medio Ambiente”. Montevideo: Mercosul, 2022. Disponível em: https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/93008_ATTAD0RO.pdf. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2026.

MERCOSUL. (Argentina; Brasil; Paraguay; Uruguay). Ata de 74ª Reunião Ordinária do Subgrupo de Trabalho n. 06 “Medio Ambiente”. Montevideo: Mercosul, 2023. Disponível em: https://documentos.mercosur.int/simfiles/docreuniones/94729_SGT6_2023_ACTA01_ES_LXXIV.pdf. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2026.

PUTNAM, Robert D. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, Cambridge, v. 42, n. 3, p. 427–460, 1988

REED, Mark S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, v. 141, n. 10, p. 2417–2431, 2008.

STONE, Diane. Non-Governmental Policy Networks: The "Think Tank" as a Role Model for the Bridge between Knowledge and Power. Global Society, v. 14, n. 2, p. 149–173, 2000.

STRINGER, Lindsay C. et al. Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society, v. 11, n. 2, art. 39, 2006.

Published

2026-09-24

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Bressan, R. N. (2026). Domestic actors and regional integration: Argentine perceptions of the 2030 Agenda in Mercosur. Brazilian Journal of Latin American Studies, 25(52), e247351. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1676-6288.bjlas.2026.247351