Efeitos de conteúdos emocionais sobre o raciocínio dedutivo humano: uma revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e210052Palavras-chave:
raciocínio, emoção, conteúdos emocionaisResumo
O raciocínio e a emoção apresentam complexas e numerosas relações entre si, podendo prejudicar ou
beneficiar o processamento lógico. Visando investigar a influência da tonalidade afetiva sobre o raciocínio, realizouse uma revisão sistemática advinda da busca de estudos publicados nas bases de dados do Portal de Periódicos
da Capes, Scielo, PubMed e Google Acadêmico. Os descritores utilizados foram: (affective content OR evaluative
content OR emotion*) AND (reasoning). Após análise e submissão aos critérios de inclusão e exclusão, restaram 17
artigos, duas dissertações de mestrado e uma tese de doutorado. Apenas um dos estudos foi realizado no Brasil.
Os participantes das pesquisas selecionadas tiveram pior desempenho nas tarefas de raciocínio formadas por
conteúdos valorativos negativos. Entretanto, os conteúdos negativos influenciaram de forma positiva o raciocínio
dedutivo quando se mostravam relevantes para a realização da tarefa. Assim, os estudos selecionados parecem
apontar para a importância das emoções sobre o raciocínio humano.
Downloads
Referências
Alba-Juez, L. (2021). Fast and slow thinking as secret agents behind speakers’ (un)conscious pragmatic decisions and judgements. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.016
Aven, T. (2018). How the integration of System 1-System 2 thinking and recent risk perspectives can improve risk assessment and management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 180, 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.031
Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014
Blanchette, I. (2006). The effect of emotion on interpretation and logic in a conditional reasoning task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1112-1125. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193257
Blanchette, I. (2014). Emotion and Reasoning. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2004). Reasoning About Emotional and Neutral Materials: Is Logic Affected by Emotion? Psychological Science, 15(11), 745-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00751.x
Blanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 24(4), 561-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903132496
Blanchette, I., & Leese, J. (2011). The effect of negative emotion on deductive reasoning: Examining the contribution of physiological arousal. Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000090
Blanchette, I., & Campbell, M. (2012). Reasoning about highly emotional topics: Syllogistic reasoning in a group of war veterans. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.603693
Blanchette, I., & El-Deredy, W. (2014). An ERP investigation of conditional reasoning with emotional and neutral contents. Brain and Cognition, 91, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.08.001
Blanchette, I., & Nougarou, F. (2017). Incidental emotions have a greater impact on the logicality of less proficient reasoners. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(1), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1228546
Blanchette, I., Gavigan, S., & Johnston, K. (2014a). Does emotion help or hinder reasoning? The moderating role of relevance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1049-1064. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034996
Blanchette, I., Lindsay, P., & Davies, S. (2014b). Intense emotional experiences and logicality: An exploration of deductive reasoning in survivors of sexual abuse. The Psychological Record, 64(4), 859-867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0073-4
Blanchette, I., Caparos, S., & Trémolière, B. (2018). Emotion and reasoning. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 57-70). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Blanchette, I., Richards, A., Melnyk, L., & Lavda, A. (2007). Reasoning about emotional contents following shocking terrorist attacks: a tale of three cities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.13.1.47
Brunetti, M., Perrucci, M. G., Di Naccio, M. R., Ferretti, A., Del Gratta, C., Casadio, C., & Romani, G. L. (2014). Framing deductive reasoning with emotional content: An fMRI study. Brain and Cognition, 87, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.017
Cagnin, S., & Leme, M. I. S. (2018). The effects of the evaluative content of premises on the deductive reasoning of psychology students. Temas em Psicologia, 26(2), 819-834. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2018.2-11Pt
Caparos, S., & Blanchette, I. (2016). Independent effects of relevance and arousal on deductive reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 31(5), 1012-1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1179173
Carreira, S., Amado, N., & Jacinto, H. (2020). Venues for Analytical Reasoning Problems: How Children Produce Deductive Reasoning. Education Science, 10(6), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060169
Dawson, R. L., Calear, A. L., McCallum, S. M., McKenna, S., Nixon, R. D., & O’Kearney, R. (2021). Exposure-based writing therapies for subthreshold and clinical posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 34(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22596
De Neys, W. (2017). Bias, conflict, and fast logic: Towards a hybrid dual process future? In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual Process Theory 2.0 (pp. 47-65). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
De Neys, W., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Logic, Fast and Slow: Advances in Dual-Process Theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419855658
Dolcos, F., Katsumi, Y., Denkova, E., & Dolcos, S. (2017). Factors Influencing Opposing Effects of Emotion on Cognition: A Review of Evidence from Research on Perception and Memory. In I. Opris, & M. Casanova (Eds.), The Physics of the Mind and Brain Disorders (vol. 11, pp. 297-341). Springer, Cham.
Eimontaite, I., Goel, V., Raymont, V., Krueger, F., Schindler, I., & Grafman, J. (2018). Differential roles of polar orbital prefrontal cortex and parietal lobes in logical reasoning with neutral and negative emotional content. Neuropsychologia, 119, 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.014
Eliades, M., Mansell, W., Stewart, A. J., & Blanchette, I. (2012). An investigation of belief-bias and logicality in reasoning with emotional contents. Thinking & Reasoning, 18(4), 461-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.713317
Forgas, J. P., & Baumeister, R. (Eds.). (2019). The Social Psychology of Gullibility: Conspiracy Theories, Fake News and Irrational Beliefs. Oxon, UK & New York: Routledge.
Goel, V., & Vartanian, O. (2011). Negative emotions can attenuate the influence of beliefs on logical reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 25(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931003593942
Goel, V., Lam, E., Smith, K. W., Goel, A., Raymont, V., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2017). Lesions to polar/orbital prefrontal cortex selectively impair reasoning about emotional material. Neuropsychologia, 99, 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.006
Gosselin, J., & Blanchette, I. (2018). L’influence des émotions intégrales positives sur le raisonnement déductif. L’Année Psychologique, 118(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy1.181.0037
Greenberg, L. S., & Goldman, R. N. (Eds.). (2019). Clinical handbook of emotion-focused therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Greenspan, P. (2019). The evaluative content of emotion. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 85, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246118000693
Harvey, A. (2018). Effects of emotion, emotional tolerance, and emotional processing on reasoning (Dissertação de Mestrado, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, U.S). Recuperado de https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/10976/167052/Harvey_uccs_0892N_10416.pdf?sequence=1
Harvey, A. M., & Kisley, M. A. (2023). Effects of emotion, emotional tolerance, and emotional processing on reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 37(6), 1090-1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2023.2228539
Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., & Ferré, P. (2019). Affective neurolinguistics: Towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1620957
Jung, N., Wranke, C., Hamburger, K., & Knauff, M. (2014). How emotions affect logical reasoning: Evidence from experiments with mood-manipulated participants, spider phobics, and people with exam anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00570
Kahneman, D. (2012). Rápido e devagar: Duas formas de pensar. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Objetiva.
Lefford, A. (1946). The influence of emotional subject matter on logical reasoning. Journal of General Psychology, 34, 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1946.10544530
Linares-Espinós, E., Hernández, V., Domínguez-Escrig, J. L., Fernández-Pello, S., Hevia, V., Mayor, J., ... Ribal, M. J. (2018). Methodology of a systematic review. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition), 42(8), 499-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2018.07.002
Littrell, S., Fugelsang, J., & Risko, E. F. (2019). Overconfidently underthinking: Narcissism negatively predicts cognitive reflection. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1633404
Marling, M. R. (2015). Left Hemisphere Lesions Differentially Impact Conditional Reasoning with Familiar and Emotional Content (Dissertação de Mestrado, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canadá). Recuperado de https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10315/30018/Marling_Miriam_RR_2015_Masters.pdf?sequence=2
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
Morsanyi, K., McCormack, T., & O’Mahony, E. (2017). The link between deductive reasoning and mathematics. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(2), 234-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1384760
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Watkins, E. R. (2011). A heuristic for developing transdiagnostic models of psychopathology: Explaining multifinality and divergent trajectories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 589-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611419672
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2019). New paradigms in the psychology of reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 305-330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051132
Plass, J. L., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Four ways of considering emotion in cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09473-5
Santos, S. L., & Godoy, E. (2021). Arquitetura do processamento cognitivo: Efeito racional e efeito emocional. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 21(3), 435-454. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-210309-11320
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726. Recuperado de http://pages.ucsd.edu/~mckenzie/StanovichBBS.pdf
Stollstorff, M. (2010). Modulation of reasoning bias and brain activation by serotonin transporter genotype and emotional content (Tese de Doutorado, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA). Recuperado de https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/553227/stollstorffMelanie.pdf?isAllowed=y&sequence=1
Tay, S. W., Ryan, P., & Ryan, C. A. (2016). Systems 1 and 2 thinking processes and cognitive reflection testing in medical students. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 7(2), e97-e103. Recuperado de https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5344059/
Trémolière, B., Maheux-Caron, V., Lepage, J. F., & Blanchette, I. (2018). tDCS stimulation of the dlPFC selectively moderates the detrimental impact of emotion on analytical reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 568. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00568
Trutescu, G., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2019). Logical reasoning in a deductive version of the mastermind game (Dissertação de Mestrado, Leiden University, Holanda). https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/hzqx3
Viau-Quesnel, C., Savary, M., & Blanchette, I. (2019). Reasoning and concurrent timing: A study of the mechanisms underlying the effect of emotion on reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 33(5), 1020-1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1535427
Wharton, T., Bonard, C., Dukes, D., Sander, D., & Oswald, S. (2021). Relevance and emotion. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.001
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2005). Teoria da Relevância. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 5, 221-268. Recuperado de https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/article/view/287/301
Yama, H. (2018). Thinking and reasoning across cultures. In L. J. Ball & V. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Routledge International handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 624-638). Oxon, UK & New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Psicologia USP
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo de Psicologia USP está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons BY-NC, exceto onde identificado diferentemente.
A aprovação dos textos para publicação implica a cessão imediata e sem ônus dos direitos de publicação para a revista Psicologia USP, que terá a exclusividade de publicá-los primeiramente.
A revista incentiva autores a divulgarem os pdfs com a versão final de seus artigos em seus sites pessoais e institucionais, desde que estes sejam sem fins lucrativos e/ou comerciais, mencionando a publicação original em Psicologia USP.
