Intersectional dialogical self: advancing the debate on self constitution processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e239000Keywords:
dialogical self, intersectionality, human development, resistanceAbstract
This theoretical essay introduces the Intersectional Dialogical Self (IDS), a model that integrates Dialogical Self Theory (DST) with Intersectional Epistemology to explain how gender, race, class, and motherhood-based oppression intersect in shaping the Self within rigidly hierarchical organizations. While DST addresses internal multivocality, it does not examine the forces that legitimize or silence voices. The intersectional lens fills this gap by treating these markers as co-constitutive dimensions of power. A go-along interview with a mother who is a military police officer inspired the model’s refinement; no empirical data are presented. IDS highlights three dynamics: (1) unequal legitimization of central voices, (2) intersectional silencing of peripheral voices, and (3) dialogical re-signification that underpins resistance and transformation. The article outlines the theoretical foundations, details the IDS, and discusses its theoretical and analytical implications, offering guidance for inclusive policies. It concludes with recommendations for multicenter studies to test and enhance the construct.
Downloads
References
Akotirene, C. (2019). Interseccionalidade. São Paulo, SP: Pólen Produção Editorial.
Azmitia, M., Garcia Peraza, P. D., & Casanova, S. (2023). Social identities and intersectionality: A conversation about the what and the how of development. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 5, 169-191. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120321-022756
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (C. Emerson, trad.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bento, M. A. (2024). Branquitude e racismo institucional: uma análise crítica. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Bilge, S. (2013). Intersectionality undone: Saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 405-424. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X13000283
Brah, A. (2006). Diferença, diversidade e diferenciação. In M. Muniz & M. R. Ribeiro (eds.), Diferenças culturais e práticas pedagógicas (pp. 17-38). Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785-810. https://doi: 10.1086/669608.
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2020). Intersectionality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. doi: 10.2307/1229039
Faria, J. H. (2023). It has gone and no one knows if it will return: The progressive disappearance of the original theory. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 27(1), Article e220065. doi: 10.1590/1982-7849rac2022220065.en
Freire, I. R., & Branco, A. U. (2016). A teoria do self dialógico em perspectiva. Temas em Psicologia, 24(2), 657-671. doi: 10.1590/0102-37722016012426025033
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). Who am I? Towards a multi-voiced dialogical self. In B. D. Slife, S. C. Yanchar, & F. C. Richardson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Critiques, problems, and alternatives to psychological ideas (pp. 267-284). New York: Routledge.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2011). The dialogical self: A process of positioning in space and time. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the self (pp. 652-678). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Gieser, T. (2012). Introductory chapter: History, main tenets and core concepts of dialogical self theory. In H. J. M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 1-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., Kempen, H. J. G., & Van Loon, R. J. P. (1992). The dialogical self beyond: Individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47(1), 23-33. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.23.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (50th anniversary ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lopes de Oliveira, M. C. S. (2023). Como os seres humanos se desenvolvem? A perspectiva da psicologia cultural. In: M. S. Neves-Pereira & A. U. Branco (Eds.). A psicologia cultural chega à escola (pp. 35-64). Information Age Publishing.
Lopes de Oliveira, M. C. S., Branco, A. U., Araújo, I. A. A., & Paula, L. D. (2025). Introdução à psicologia cultural: Teoria, pesquisa e desenvolvimento humano. Campinas: Alínea.
Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742-759. doi: j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meneghetti, F. K. (2011). O que é um ensaio-teórico? Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 15(2), 320-332. doi:10.1590/S1415-65552011000200010.
Mohanty, C. T. (2013). Transnational feminist crossings: On neoliberalism and radical critique. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 967-991. doi: 10.1086/669576
Nicoll, A. (2024). Considerations of intersectionality in psychological research. Plurality, 1, e10078. doi: 10.2218/plurality.10078.
Oyěwùmí, O. (1997). The invention of women: Making an African sense of Western gender discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rice, C., Harrison, E., & Friedman, M. (2019). Doing justice to intersectionality in research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 19(6), 409-420. doi: 10.1177/1532708619829779
Rossato, M., & Mitjáns Martinez, A. (2018). A metodologia construtivo-interpretativa como expressão da Epistemologia Qualitativa na pesquisa sobre o desenvolvimento da subjetividade. In A. P. Costa, P. A. Castro, S. O. Sá, & R. A. Saavedra (Eds.), 6º Congresso Ibero-Americano em Investigação Qualitativa: Investigação Qualitativa na Educação (pp. 343-352). Aveiro: Ludomedia.
Spade, D. (2013). Intersectional resistance and law reform. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 1031-1055. doi: 10.1086/669574
Tomlinson, B. (2013). To tell the truth and not get trapped: Desire, distance, and intersectionality at the scene of argument. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 993-1017. doi: 10.1086/669573
Valsiner, J. (2012). Fundamentos da psicologia cultural: Mundos da mente, mundos da vida. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.
Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.
Westberg, D. W., & Syed, M. (2024). Integrating personality psychology and intersectionality to advance diversity in the study of persons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18, e12956. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12956
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Psicologia USP

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo de Psicologia USP está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons BY-NC, exceto onde identificado diferentemente.
A aprovação dos textos para publicação implica a cessão imediata e sem ônus dos direitos de publicação para a revista Psicologia USP, que terá a exclusividade de publicá-los primeiramente.
A revista incentiva autores a divulgarem os pdfs com a versão final de seus artigos em seus sites pessoais e institucionais, desde que estes sejam sem fins lucrativos e/ou comerciais, mencionando a publicação original em Psicologia USP.
