Psychoanalysis and the ScientifcThinking: Between the Phsysicism and/or the Counter-Science in Different Ways of Subjectivity.

Authors

  • Rogério Lustosa Bastos Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/psicousp.v12i1.108124

Keywords:

Psychoanalysis. Scientific thinking. Counter-science.

Abstract

Discussing psychoanalysis, from its insertion in the language and in the Human Sciences, chiefly focusing on Foucault, this article calls in question its nearness and farness regarding the scientific thinking. Thus, m ainly analyzing it in its interconnections to the contem poraneous subjectivity, it will be highlighted that such discipline not only stands off from the basic param eters of the classical scientific thinking, but also lays itself as an aside Science, or rather, as a counter-science. Such feature, besides the vocation for clinical psychology, puts it into relief as a discipline which offers other important contributions, being them in the aesthetics field, in the epistem ology, in the authorship, which is multiple, and in the hum anities as a whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2001-01-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Psychoanalysis and the ScientifcThinking: Between the Phsysicism and/or the Counter-Science in Different Ways of Subjectivity. (2001). Psicologia USP, 12(1), 89-119. https://doi.org/10.1590/psicousp.v12i1.108124