Comparative analysis of performance trajectories by age, sex, and bodyweight class in Brazilian and International Para Powerlifting

Autores

  • Guilliber Carlos da Fonseca SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Neurorehabilitation Program for Spinal Cord Injury, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
  • Jefferson Rodrigues Dorneles SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Neurorehabilitation Program for Spinal Cord Injury, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
  • João Henrique Carneiro Leão Veloso SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Neurological Rehabilitation Program, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Sonny Állan Silva Bezerra SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Orthopedic Rehabilitation Program, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
  • Frederico Ribeiro Neto SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Paralympic Sports Department, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-4690.2026e40249541

Palavras-chave:

Athletic performance, Exercise, Physical education and training, Strength training, Sports for disabled people, Para Sports, Para-Athletes

Resumo

Objective: To analyze performance trajectories according to age, sex, and bodyweight class among Brazilian Para powerlifting (PP) athletes and to compare these patterns with those observed in their international counterparts. Method: Retrospective cohort study. Results: Performance data from Brazilian National Championships (2017-2025) were analyzed, including weight lifted, age, sex, and bodyweight class; the analyses of age and age at peak performance additionally incorporated data from regional Meetings. Across the study period, several bodyweight classes showed positive correlations between weight lifted and competition year, indicating a general tendency toward performance improvement, particularly among female athletes (r=0.46; p<0.001). In male athletes, the overall correlation was weaker (r=0.26; p<0.001), with significant improvements observed mainly in the up to 49.0 kg, up to 80.0 kg, and over 107.0 kg categories. The age profile of competitors remained relatively stable throughout competition years, with isolated exceptions in specific bodyweight classes. Linear mixed-effects models indicated that peak performance generally occurred between the late twenties and the fifth decade of life, with most male bodyweight classes peaking between 27 and 42 years, while female athletes showed greater variability, reaching up to 52.5 years in one category. The time required to reach peak performance after the first final participation ranged from approximately 3 to 6 years in male athletes and 4 to 7 years in female athletes. Conclusion: Brazilian PP athletes demonstrate overall improvements in lifted weight across recent competition cycles, with a stable age structure and peak performance typically occurring in mature adulthood. These patterns are broadly consistent with those reported for international athletes and provide reference values that may support athlete development, performance monitoring, and long-term planning in PP.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

1. International Paralympic Committee (IPC). World Para Powerlifting rules and regulations 2025 [Internet]. Bonn: International Paralympic Committee; 2025. Available from: https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/WPPO%20Rules%20and%20Regulations%202025_v1_FINAL_4.pdf.

2. Severin AC, Baumgart JK, Haugen T, Hogarth L. Peak age and performance trajectories in Para powerlifters. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023. Epub 2022 May 25. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002051.

3. Comitê Paralímpico Brasileiro. Manual de halterofilismo. Diretoria Técnica. São Paulo: Comitê Paralímpico Brasileiro; 2015.

4. Croix MDS. Advances in paediatric strength assessment: changing our perspective on strength development. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;6(3):292-304.

5. Baker D. Comparison of upper-body strength and power between professional and college-aged rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):30-5.

6. Huebner M, Perperoglou A. Performance development from youth to senior and age of peak performance in Olympic weightlifting. Front Physiol. 2019. Epub 2019 Aug 27. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.01121.

7. Solberg PA, Hopkins WG, Paulsen G, Haugen TA. Peak age and performance progression in world-class weightlifting and powerlifting athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(10):1357-63.

8. Allen SV, Hopkins WG. Age of peak competitive performance of elite athletes: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2015;45(10):1431-41.

9. Longo AF, Siffredi CR, Lentini NA, et al. Age of peak performance in Olympic Sports. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016;48:849.

10. Haugen TA, Solberg PA, Foster C, Morán-Navarro R, Breitschädel F, Hopkins WG. Peak age and performance progression in world-class track-and-field athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(9):1122-29.

11. Severin AC, Kinderen A, Baumgart JK. Effect of the athletes’ origin and type of impairment on participation and the likelihood of winning a medal in the Paralympic Games. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025. Epub 2024 Jul 3. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002548.

12. Patatas JM, De Bosscher V, Legg D. Understanding parasport: an analysis of the differences between able-bodied and parasport from a sport policy perspective. Int J Sport Policy Politics. 2018;10(2):235-54.

13. van den Hoek D, Garrett J, Howells R, Latella C. Paralympians are stronger than you know: a comparison of para and nondisabled powerlifting bench press world records. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(2):452-56.

14. Hogarth L, Nicholson V, Payton C, Burkett B. Modelling the age-related trajectory of performance in para swimmers with physical, vision and intellectual impairment. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(4):925-35.

15. Schipman J, Gallo P, Marc A, et al. Age-related changes in para and wheelchair racing athlete's performances. Front Physiol. 2019;10:256. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00256.

16. Ribeiro Neto F, Vara MFF, Dorneles JR, Costa RRG. Performance trajectory related to age, classification and sex in elite kayak para canoe athletes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;103(5):448-57. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002308.

17. Costa RRG, Ribeiro Neto F, Ramos BL, Tanhoffer R, O'Shea B, Winckler C. Age-related trajectory and age at peak competitive performance in wheelchair rugby players at the Paralympic Games. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;103(8):747-52.

18. Kons RL, Apollaro G, Henríquez M, et al. Age at peak competitive performance in judo: a comparison between Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2025;21(3): 1887-94. doi:10.1177/17479541251369304.

19. Dehghansai N, Spedale D, Wilson MJ, Baker J. Comparing developmental trajectories of elite able-bodied and wheelchair basketball players. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2020;37(3):338-48.

20. Ribeiro Neto F, Winckler C, Costa RRG. Origin of impairment and timing of impairment manifestation in Paralympic sport. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;103(8). doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002474.

21. Patatas JM, De Bosscher V, Derom I, Winckler C. Stakeholders' perceptions of athletic career pathways in Paralympic sport: from participation to excellence. Sport Soc. 2022;25(2):299-320.

22. Patatas JM, De Rycke J, De Bosscher V, Kons RL. It's a long way to the top: determinants of developmental pathways in Paralympic sport. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2021;38(4):605-25.

23. International Paralympic Committee (IPC). Paralympic Games: summer overview [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2023 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.paralympic.org/paralympic-games/summer-overview.

24. Pilon F, Prince F. Does producing scientific articles lead to Paralympic podiums? Biomechanics. 2024;4(1):123-43.

25. International Paralympic Committee (IPC). IPC Historical Results Archive [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ipc-services.org/hira/countries/profile/code/BRA

26. Morgan DP. The essential guide to SAS dates and times. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.; 2014.

27. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284-90.

28. Griffin JE, Hinoveanu LC, Hopker JG. Bayesian modelling of elite sporting performance with large databases. J Quant Anal Sports. 2022;18:253-68.

29. Berthelot G, Sedeaud A, Marck A, et al. Has athletic performance reached its peak? Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1263-71.

30. Dehghansai N, Baker J. Searching for Paralympians: characteristics of participants attending "search" events. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2020;37(1):129-38.

31. Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006;1(1):50-7.

32. Bernards JR, Sato K, Haff GG, Bazyler CD. Current research and statistical practices in sport science and a need for change. Sports. 2017;5(4):87.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-11-10

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Carlos da Fonseca, G., Dorneles, J. R., Veloso, J. H. C. L., Bezerra, S. Állan S., & Ribeiro Neto, F. (2026). Comparative analysis of performance trajectories by age, sex, and bodyweight class in Brazilian and International Para Powerlifting. Revista Brasileira De Educação Física E Esporte, 40, e40249541. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-4690.2026e40249541