Escolhas relacionadas ao uso de ajuda física aumentam afetos positivos após acidente vascular encefálico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-5509201800020299Palabras clave:
Dano cerebral, Reabilitação, Marcha, Ajuda física, Autonomia, AfetosResumen
Este estudo observou os efeitos de escolhas relacionadas ao uso de ajuda física durante a marcha em adultos após acidente vascular encefálico (AVE). Dezoito adultos hemiparéticos (40 a 74 anos), após AVE, praticaram uma tarefa: andar uma distância de quatro metros ultrapassando obstáculos no menor tempo possível, com a possibilidade de utilizar um apoio de membro superior (barra de apoio) sob duas diferentes condições de prática, autocontrolada ou externamente controlada. Os participantes praticaram 30 tentativas no primeiro dia, e um teste de retenção, consistindo de cinco tentativas sem uso de ajuda física, foi realizado no dia seguinte. Os resultados demonstraram melhora similar no tempo para completar o percurso em ambos os grupos. Os resultados de questionário mostraram maior nível de afetos positivos para os participantes do grupo autocontrolado em relação aos participantes do grupo externamente controlado. Conclui-se que o uso autocontrolado de ajuda física pode adicionar benefícios ao processo de melhora da marcha em sujeitos pós-AVE.
Descargas
Referencias
Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2008 update – a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117(4):e25-e146.
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Saúde lança consulta pública para o aprimoramento da assistência a pacientes com AVC [Internet]. Brasília; 2010 [citado em 2015 Fev 5]. Disponível em: http://www.brasil.gov.br/noticias/saude/2010/10/saude-abre-consulta-publica-sobre-assistencia-a-pacientes-com-avc.
van Peepen RPS, Hendriks HJM, van Meeteren NLU, Helders PJM, Kwakell G. The development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in the Netherlands: a systematic review of available evidence. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(10):767-83.
van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(13-14):831-40.
Vidoni ED, Boyd LA. Preserved motor learning after stroke is related to the degree of proprioceptive deficit. Behav Brain Funct. 2009;5:36.
Sanli EA, Patterson JT, Bray SR, Lee TD. Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Front Psychol. 2013;3:611.
Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(4):408-15.
Chiviacowsky S. Self-controlled practice: autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2014;15(5):505-10.
Wulf G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(2):96-101.
Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Medeiros FL, Kaefer A. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year old children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(3):405-10.
Patterson JT, Carter M. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Hum Mov Sci. 2010;29(2):214-27.
Ryan RM. Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. J Pers. 1995;63(3):397-427.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227-68.
Lewthwaite R, Chiviacowsky S, Drews R, Wulf, G. Choose to move: the motivacional impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015;22(5):1383-8.
Hartman JM. Self-controlled use of a perceived physical assistance device during a balancing task. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;104(3 Pt. 1):1005-16.
Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Campos T. Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture. 2012;35(4):601-5.
van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):833-62.
Bateni H, Maki BE. Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(1):134-45.
Hooyman A, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;36:190-98.
Leroux A, Pinet H, Nadeau S. Task-oriented intervention in chronic stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(10):820-30.
Bohhanon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206-7.
Brucki SMD, Nitrini CP, Bertolucii PHF, Okamoto IH. Sugestões para o uso do Mini-Exame Mental no Brasil. Arqu Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(3-8):777-81.
Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232-40.
Watson D, Clark LA. The PANAS-X: manual for the positive and negative affect schedule: expanded form. Psychol. 1994;52:409-18.
Boyd LA, Quaney BM, Pohl PS, Winstein CJ. Learning implicitly: effects of task and severity after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(5):444-54.
Buurke JH, Hermens HJ, Erren-Wolters CV, Nene AV. The effect of walking aids on muscle activation patterns during walking in stroke patients. Gait Posture. 2005;22(2):164-70.
Tyson SF, Rogerson L. Assistive walking devices in nonambulant patients undergoing rehabilitation after stroke: the effects of the functional mobility, walking impairments, and patients’ opinion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(3):475-79.
Robertson JVG, Hoellinger T, Lindberg P, Bensmail D, Hanneton S, Brami AR. Effect of auditory feedback differs according to side of hemiparesis: a comparative pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:45.
Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation: a quantitative analysis of stroke professionals attitudes. Stroke. 2002;33(2):444-48.
Bilge C, Coçer E, Coçer A, Börü UT. Depression of functional outcome after stroke: the effect of antidepressant therapy on functional recovery. Eur J Phys Rehab Med. 2008;44(1):13-8.
Colombo R, Pisano F, Mazzone A, et al. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4:3.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Todo o conteúdo da revista, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons (CC-BY)
