The role of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) in accounting conservatism: Evidence from Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20242049.enKeywords:
accounting conservatism, ESG performance, CSR, earnings quality, information asymmetryAbstract
This study investigates whether there is an association between environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) performance and the demand for accounting conservatism in companies listed on the Brazilian Stock Exchange. Recognizing that conservative accounting practices often arise from stakeholders’ concerns about earnings management and information asymmetry – conditions that differ from those of socially responsible companies – this paper explores the relationship between ESG performance and accounting conservatism. This study examines accounting conservatism as a principle of information quality, particularly within the framework of mechanisms such as ESG performance that mitigate information asymmetry. Despite Brazil’s weak enforcement profile, limited general credit availability, and high ownership concentration, the country is globally recognized for its adoption of Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) reporting standards. These conditions reinforce our assumption and highlight the significance of this study. There is a notable paucity of research investigating the correlation between ESG performance and accounting conservatism in Brazil, especially given the country’s unique regulatory and economic landscape. This study addresses this gap by providing a critical perspective on the interplay between ESG and accounting conservatism. Our findings have substantial practical, social, and environmental implications. Effective disclosure of ESG practices not only enhances the quality of reported information but also increases stakeholder credibility, enabling investors and other stakeholders to make more informed and assertive decisions. We estimate conservatism according to the model proposed by Ball and Shivakumar (2005), and in the main analyses, we use ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and quantile regression methods with robust standard errors and fixed effects for industry and years. Our research indicates that higher ESG performance leads to increased conditional accounting conservatism in the following year. This finding suggests that robust ESG reporting enhances the quality of information available for decision-making, thereby reducing information asymmetry between the company and its stakeholders while bolstering its reputation.
Downloads
References
Alves, S. (2023). Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union? Cogent Business & Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219088
Anagnostopoulou, S. C., Tsekrekos, A. E., & Voulgaris, G. (2021). Accounting conservatism and corporate social responsibility. British Accounting Review, 53(4), 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100942
Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001
Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2006). The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(2), 207-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00198.x
Ball, R., Kothari, S., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00012-4
Barbosa, I. S., & Klann, R. C. (2023). Efeitos do desempenho ambiental, social e de governança na relevância das informações contábeis de empresas brasileiras. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 20(54), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2023.e86044
Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 24, 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
Boulhaga, M., Elbardan, H., & Elmassri, M. (2023). The effect of internal control and corporate social responsibility on conditional accounting conservatism: Evidence from France. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 34(2), 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22605
Bozzolan, S., Fabrizi, M., Mallin, C. A., & Michelon, G. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and earnings quality: International evidence. International Journal of Accounting, 50(4), 361-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2015.10.003
Brito, G. A. S., & Martins, E. (2013). Accounting conservatism and the cost of bank credit in Brazil. Brazilian Business Review, 10(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2013.10.1.2
Burke, Q. L., Chen, P. C., & Lobo, G. J. (2020). Is corporate social responsibility performance related to conditional accounting conservatism? Accounting Horizons, 34(2), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-18-111
Caskey, J., & Laux, V. (2017). Corporate governance, accounting conservatism, and manipulation. Management Science, 63(2), 424-437. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2341
Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer, R. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.005
Cui, J., Jo, H., & Na, H. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry? Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 549-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3003-8
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
Elshandidy, T., & Hassanein, A. (2014). Do IFRS and board of directors’ independence affect accounting conservatism? Applied Financial Economics, 24(16), 1091-1102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2014.924291
Environment Programme – Principles for Responsible Investment. (2024). What are the principles for responsible investment? https://www.unpri.org/about-us/what-are-the-principles-for-responsible-investment
Fávero, L. P., & Belfiore, P. (2017). Manual de análise de dados. Elsevier.
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1980). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2. Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. https://fasb.org/page/ShowPdf?path=aop_CON2.pdf&title=CON%202%20(AS%20AMENDED)
Francis, R. N., Harrast, S., Mattingly, J., & Olsen, L. (2013). The relation between accounting conservatism and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation. Business and Society Review, 118(2), 193-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.12008
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Garanina, T., & Kim, O. (2023). The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 50(2), 100522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2023.100522
García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2014). Information consequences of accounting conservatism. European Accounting Review, 23(2), 173-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.882263
García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2020). Conditional conservatism and the limits to earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106738
Gray, R. (1990). The greening of accountancy: The profession after pearce. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.
Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.005
Hong, S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and accounting conservatism. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 19(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2020.103883
Hübel, B., & Scholz, H. (2020). Integrating sustainability risks in asset management: The role of ESG exposures and ESG ratings. Journal of Asset Management, 21(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-019-00139-z
International Accounting Standards Board. (2018). Conceptual framework for financial reporting. IFRS Foundation.
Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1929-2
Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 132-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
Khemir, S., Baccouche, C., & Ayadi, S. D. (2019). The influence of ESG information on investment allocation decisions: An experimental study in an emerging country. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(4), 458-480. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-12-2017-0141
Khlifi, S., Boujelbene, M. A., & Chouaibi, J. (2024). The effect of economic, environmental and social sustainability performance on accounting conservatism: The moderating role of good corporate governance. Review of Accounting and Finance, 23(5), 646-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-08-2023-0291
Kim, Y., Li, S., Pan, C., & Zuo, L. (2013). The role of accounting conservatism in the equity market: Evidence from seasoned equity offerings. Accounting Review, 88(4), 1327-1356. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50420
Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Accounting Review, 87(3), 761-796. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10209
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler International. (2022). Big Shifts, small steps: Survey of sustainability reporting 2022. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2022/10/ssr-small-steps-big-shifts.pdf
LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2008). The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 447-478. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447
Larrinaga, C. (2023). Sustainability accounting: ESG approaches are not enough. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 34(91), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20239042.en
Lee, H. S., Li, X., & Sami, H. (2015). Conditional conservatism and audit fees. Accounting Horizons, 29(1), 83-113. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50928
Liu, G., Qian, H., Shi, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wu, F. (2024). Does ESG report greenwashing increase stock price crash risk? China Journal of Accounting Studies, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2024.2303070
Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.03.001
Martin, P. R., & Moser, D. V. (2016). Managers’ green investment disclosures and investors’ reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.08.004
Moreira, R. de L., Colauto, R. D., & Amaral, H. F. (2010). Conservadorismo condicional: estudo a partir de variáveis econômicas. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 21(54), 64-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772010000300006
Pan, Y., & Zhao, R. (2022). Does mandatory disclosure of CSR reports affect accounting conservatism? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(7), 1975-1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.1949283
Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2020). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001
Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X.-J. (2002). Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237-264. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.237
Roychowdhury, S., & Watts, R. L. (2007). Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, market-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1-2), 2–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.12.003
Ruch, G. W., & Taylor, G. (2015). Accounting conservatism:
A review of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34, 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.02.001
Schiehll, E., & Kolahgar, S. (2021). Financial materiality in the informativeness of sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 840-855. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2657
Shankar Shaw, T., Raithatha, M., Krishnan, G. V., & Cordeiro, J. J. (2021). Did mandatory CSR compliance impact accounting conservatism? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 17(3), 100280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2021.100280
Sousa, E. F. de, & Galdi, F. C. (2016). The relationship between equity ownership concentration and earnings quality: Evidence from Brazil. RAUSP Management Journal, 51(4), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.006
Van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG integration and the investment management process: Fundamental investing reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8
Wan, G., & Dawod, A. Y. (2022). ESG rating and northbound capital shareholding preferences: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(15), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159152
Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting Part I : Explanations and implications, 17(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.207
Yin, M., Zhang, J., & Han, J. (2020). Impact of CEO-board social ties on accounting conservatism: Internal control quality as a mediator. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 52, 101172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101172
Yoon, B., Kim, B., & Lee, J. H. (2019). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Evidence from the Korean market. Sustainability, 11(15), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154116
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content of the article(s) published in the RC&F are of the entire liability of the authors, including with regard to the truth, updating and accuracy of data and information. The authors shall assign the rights in advance to the Department of Accounts and Actuarial Sciences of the FEA/USP, which shall permit the publication of extracts or of the whole, with prior permission, provided that the source is cited (Creative Commons – CCBY).
RC&F shall not charge a fee for the submission of articles. The submission of articles to RC&F shall imply that the author(s) authorizes/authorize its publication without the payment of author’s rights.
The submission of articles shall authorize the RC&F to adjust the text of the article(s) to their publication formats and if necessary, to make spelling, grammar and regulatory changes.
