Effects of familiarity, task complexity, and preparer experience on revenue recognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20252215.enKeywords:
behavioral accounting, revenue recognition, IFRS 15, judgment heuristics, standard complexityAbstract
This study examines how familiarity with accounting standards, task complexity, and preparer experience influence accountants’ judgment and decision-making (JDM) regarding the accounting for revenues from contracts with customers. Recognizing the impact of familiarity with standards and experience on accounting decisions enables organizations to invest in preparer training and development, ensuring preparedness for new standards and complex tasks. Understanding how familiarity with accounting standards and preparers’ experience influence accounting decisions improves the transparency and reliability of financial reports, which benefits investors, regulators, and stakeholders by reinforcing corporate governance and market stability. The experiment employed a 2×2 design that manipulated familiarity with accounting standards (International Accounting Standard [IAS] 18 vs. International Financial Reporting Standards [IFRS] 15) and task complexity. Financial statement preparers completed a revenue accounting task. We compared the participants’ decisions using an analysis of variance and variance ratio tests to measure noise in judgments between participants in the four groups. Additionally, we measured the preparer’s experience based on their length of experience in the accounting profession. The results indicate that familiarity with the standards and task complexity did not significantly affect decision-making. However, greater familiarity with a standard led to more varied decisions. Interestingly, even in complex tasks, familiarity with a standard increased decision variability. Moreover, less experienced preparers exhibited greater variability in their decisions between complex and non-complex tasks than more experienced preparers did. These findings suggest that financial statement preparers in Brazil are adapting to new standards and highlight the impact of experience on the effect of task complexity on accounting judgment.
Downloads
References
Abdolmohammadi, M., & Wright, A. (1987). An examination of the effects of experience and task complexity on audit judgments. Accounting Review, 62(1), 1-13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248042
Aladwey, L., & Diab, A. (2023). The determinants and effects of the early adoption of IFRS 15:Evidence from a developing country. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2167544. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2167544
Almeida, N. S. D., & Lemes, S. (2013). Evidências do entendimento de quatro pronunciamentos contábeis por auditores independentes do Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 17, 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552013000100006
Arnold, V., Collier, P. A., Leech, S. A., & Sutton, S. G. (2000). The effect of experience and complexity on order and recency bias in decision making by professional accountants. Accounting & Finance, 40(2), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-629X.00039
Asare, S. K., & McDaniel, L. S. (1996). The effects of familiarity with the preparer and task complexity on the effectiveness of the audit review process. The Accounting Review, 71(2), 139–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/248443
Barniv, R. R., Myring, M., & Westfall, T. (2022). Does IFRS experience improve analyst performance?. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 46, 100443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100443
Belesis, N., Sorros, J., Karagiorgos, A., & Kousounadis, P. (2021). Cumulative effect of IFRS 15 and IFRS 16 on maritime company financial statements: A hypothetical case. SN Business & Economics, 1(3), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00043-y
Ben Salem, R., & Damak Ayadi, S. (2023). The impact of acculturation process and the institutional isomorphism on IFRS adoption. EuroMed Journal of Business, 18(2), 184-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-04-2021-0058
Bonner, S. E. (1990). Experience effects in auditing: The role of task-specific knowledge. Accounting Review, 65(1), 72-92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247877
Bradbury, M. E., & Schröder, L. B. (2012). The content of accounting standards: Principles versus rules. The British Accounting Review, 44(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2011.12.003
Brooke, L., & Taylor, P. (2005). Older workers and employment: Managing age relations. Ageing & Society, 25(3), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X05003466
Cardoso, R. L., Leite, R. O., & Aquino, A. C. B. (2023). Probable at first glance, but unlikely after closer look: The role of cognitive reflection ability on the assessment of probabilistic expressions. The International Journal of Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1142/S109440602350004X
Cova, C. J. G. (2015). Os impactos da assimilação da norma Internacional de Relatório Financeiro (IFRS 15) e seus efeitos assimétricos nas demonstrações financeiras das empresas brasileiras. Pensar Contábil, 17(64), 48-56. http://atena.org.br/revista/ojs-2.2.3-08/index.php/pensarcontabil/article/view/2623/2205
Chand, P., Leung, P., Martinov-Bennie, N., & Carey, P. (2024). Ambiguity in international financial reporting standards (IFRS) and its impact on judgments of auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(6), 587-602. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2023-3849
Chand, P., Patel, C., & Day, R. (2009). Factors causing differences in the financial reporting practices in selected south pacific countries in the post-convergence period. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 13(2), 111-129.
Chand, P., Patel, C., & Patel, A. (2010). Interpretation and application of “new” and “complex” international financial reporting standards in Fiji: Implications for convergence of accounting standards. Advances in Accounting, 26(2), 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2010.08.004
Clor‐Proell, S. M., & Maines, L. A. (2014). The impact of recognition versus disclosure on financial information: A preparer’s perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(3), 671-701. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12053
Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (CVM). (2022). Ofício-Circular/CVM/SNC/SEP/01/2022. CVM. http://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/export/sites/cvm/legislacao/oficios-circulares/snc-sep/anexos/ocsncsep012022.pdf
Doupnik, T. S., & Riccio, E. L. (2006). The influence of conservatism and secrecy on the interpretation of verbal probability expressions in the Anglo and Latin cultural areas. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 237-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2006.07.005
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
Grayot, J. D. (2020). Dual process theories in behavioral economics and neuroeconomics: A critical review. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11(1), 105-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-019-00446-9
Griffith, E. E., Hammersley, J. S., & Kadous, K. (2015). Audits of complex estimates as verification of management numbers: How institutional pressures shape practice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 833-863. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12104
Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1998). The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 47-58. http://prof.usb.ve/lcolmen/The%20Hidden%20Traps%20in%20decision%20making.pdf
Hogarth, R. M. (1975). Cognitive processes and the assessment of subjective probability distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1975.10479858
Huefner, R. J. (2016). The impact of new financial reporting standards on revenue management. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 15(1), 78-81. https://doi.org/10.1057/rpm.2015.45
International Accounting Standards Board [IASB] (2012). International Accounting Standard [IAS] 18, Revenue. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-18-revenue/#about
International Accounting Standards Board [IASB]. (2014). International Financial Reporting Standard [IFRS] 15, Revenue from contracts with customers. http://eifrs.ifrs.org/eifrs/bnstandards/en/2016/ifrs15.pdf
International Accounting Standards Board [IASB]. (2018). Conceptual framework for financial reporting. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/conceptual-framework/#standard
Johnson, L. (2018). A high-level overview of how the new accounting standard update on revenue recognition impacts the united states healthcare system. Undergraduate Honors Theses. East Tennessee State University. Paper 456. https://dc.etsu.edu/honors/456/
Kabir, H., & Su, L. (2022). How did IFRS 15 affect the revenue recognition practices and financial statements of firms? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 49, 100507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100507
Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar Straus Giroux.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747
Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. (2021). Noise: a flaw in human judgment. Hachette Books.
Khamis, A. M. (2016). Perception of preparers and auditors on new revenue recognition standard (IFRS 15): evidence from Egypt. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 3(2), 1-18. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/JDAB/article/view/5383
KPMG (2022). Revenues – IFRS 15 handbook. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2022/11/handbook-revenue.pdf
Kunze, F., Boehm, S., & Bruch, H. (2013). Age, resistance to change, and job performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7-8), 741-760. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2013-0194
Li, L., Qi, B., Tian, G., & Zhang, G. (2017). The Contagion Effect of Low-Quality Audits at the Level of Individual Auditors. The Accounting Review, 92(1), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51407
Libby, R., & Tan, H. T. (1994). Modeling the determinants of audit expertise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(8), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90030-2
Lu, H. Y., & Wang, S. (2018). Does lifting the objective-price constraint in revenue recognition increase the value relevance of earnings and revenue? Asian Review of Accounting, 26(4), 545-570. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-08-2017-0126
Mala, R., & Chand, P. (2014). Impacts of additional guidance provided on international financial reporting standards on the judgments of accountants. The International Journal of Accounting, 49(2), 263-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2014.04.008
Maradona, A. F., Chand, P., & Lodhia, S. (2022). Professional skills required by accountants for applying international financial reporting standards: implications from Indonesia. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(2), 269-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2022-1591
Mısırlıoğlu, İ. U., Tucker, J., & Yükseltürk, O. (2013). Does mandatory adoption of IFRS guarantee compliance?. The International Journal of Accounting, 48(3), 327-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2013.07.002
Napier, C. J., & Stadler, C. (2020). The real effects of a new accounting standard: The case of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Accounting and Business Research, 50(5), 474-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1770933
Nguyen, H. T. T., Nguyen, H. T. T., & Van Nguyen, C. (2023). Analysis of factors affecting the adoption of IFRS in an emerging economy. Heliyon, 9(6), e17331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17331
Obradović, V., Čupić, M., & Dimitrijević, D. (2018). Application of International Financial Reporting Standards in the transition economy of Serbia. Australian Accounting Review, 28(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12187
Penno, M. C. (2008). Rules and accounting: Vagueness in conceptual frameworks. Accounting Horizons, 22(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.3.339
Sappor, P., Atta Sarpong, F., & Ahmed Seidu Seini, R. (2023). The adoption of IFRS for SMEs in the northern sector of Ghana: A case of structural equation modeling. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2180840. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2180840
Sarquis, R. W. (2021). Afinal, o que se busca é comparabilidade ou uniformidade?. Revista Mineira de Contabilidade, 22(2), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.51320/rmc.v22i2.1355
Shanteau, J. (1989). Cognitive heuristics and biases in behavioral auditing: Review, comments and observations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14(1-2), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(89)90040-8
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.28.020177.000245
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.112
Trotman, K. T., Tan, H. C., & Ang, N. (2011). Fifty‐year overview of judgment and decision‐making research in accounting. Accounting & Finance, 51(1), 278-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2010.00398.x
Tubbs, R. M. (1992). The effect of experience on the auditor’s organization and amount of knowledge. Accounting Review, 783-801. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248324
Vargas, J. M. B., Bianchi, M., & Venturini, L. D. B. (2022). Tendências dos Principais Assuntos de Auditoria Evidenciados nos Setores de Utilidade Pública e Telecomunicações da B3. ConTexto-Contabilidade em Texto, 22(50), 63-79. https://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/121426.
Vera‐Muñoz, S. C., Kinney, W. R., & Bonner, S. E. (2001). The effects of domain experience and task presentation format on accountants’ information relevance assurance. The Accounting Review, 76(3), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2001.76.3.405
Veysey, R. (2020). ‘The real effects of a new revenue accounting standard’- a practitioner view. Accounting and Business Research, 50(5), 504-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1770935
Wanberg, C. R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.132
Zhang, Y. (2005). Revenue recognition timing and attributes of reported revenue: The case of software industry’s adoption of SOP 91–1. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(3), 535-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content of the article(s) published in the RC&F are of the entire liability of the authors, including with regard to the truth, updating and accuracy of data and information. The authors shall assign the rights in advance to the Department of Accounts and Actuarial Sciences of the FEA/USP, which shall permit the publication of extracts or of the whole, with prior permission, provided that the source is cited (Creative Commons – CCBY).
RC&F shall not charge a fee for the submission of articles. The submission of articles to RC&F shall imply that the author(s) authorizes/authorize its publication without the payment of author’s rights.
The submission of articles shall authorize the RC&F to adjust the text of the article(s) to their publication formats and if necessary, to make spelling, grammar and regulatory changes.
