Leverage, entrenched managers, and moderating effect of main shareholder’s influence

Autores/as

  • Bruno José Canassa Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Contabilidade, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8060-6894
  • Lucas Allan Diniz Schwarz Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Departamento de Contabilidade, Natal, RN, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-513X
  • Maurício Ribeiro do Valle Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Contabilidade, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2439-3526

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20241979.pt

Palabras clave:

leverage, Agency Theory, Trade-Off Theory, managerial entrenchment

Resumen

This study associated the leverage of Brazilian listed companies with their managers’ search for protection against the risk of main shareholder’s intervention. Although the literature has pointed out that managers might increase leverage in order to protect themselves against takeovers, it had not yet investigated the use of debt as a defense against the risk of intervention by the company’s main shareholder. This research addresses the main issue of corporate governance, i.e. entrenchment resulting from manager’s strengthening and excessive protection. The importance of considering the agency relationship when explaining the capital structure observed in Brazilian companies is reinforced, especially when considering the existence of optimal leverage that might maximize value for shareholders. Panel regressions tested the association of leverage with managerial strengthening and the risk of main shareholder’s intervention for a sample of Brazilian listed companies. Specifically, an interaction model was used in which the observed leverage is a function of strengthened managers, those whose compensation is always higher than expected, given company characteristics and performance, who sought protection against large shareholders who have great influence on the decisions of their companies. The results suggest that, although they have a potential interest in reducing debt discipline, entrenched managers increase debt level in the presence of a large influential shareholder, demonstrating commitment to shareholders. These results highlight the importance of Agency Theory in explaining the capital structure of Brazilian companies, and highlight similarities in the approach to leverage by managers in markets with different characteristics, such as Brazil and the United States of America (USA).

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Agha, M. (2011). Leverage, executive incentives and corporate governance. Accounting & Finance, 53(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00450.x

Aghion, P., & Tirole, J. (1997). Formal and real authority in organizations. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1086/262063

Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783-827. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn099

Berger, P., Ofek, E., & Yermack, D. (1997). Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. The Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1411-1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb01115.x

Boateng, A., Cai, H., Borgia, D., Bi, X., & Ngwu, F. (2017). The influence of internal corporate governance mechanisms on capital structure decisions of Chinese listed firms. Review of Accounting and Finance, 16(4), 444-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RAF-12-2015-0193

Brailsford, T., Oliver, B., & Pua, S. (2002). On the relation between ownership structure and capital structure. Accounting & Finance, 42(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-629X.00001

Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., & Singh, M. (2014). Powerful CEOs and capital structure decisions: Evidence from the CEO pay slice (CPS). Applied Economics Letters, 21(8), 564-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.875102

Crisóstomo, V., & Pinheiro, B. (2015). Estrutura de capital e concentração de propriedade da empresa brasileira. Revista de Finanças Aplicadas, 4(1), 1-30. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2912995

Feng, Y., Hassan, A., & Elamer, A. (2020). Corporate governance, ownership structure and capital structure: Evidence from Chinese real estate listed companies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(4), 759-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-04-2020-0042

Frank, M., & Goyal, V. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x

Garvey, G., & Hanka, G. (1999). Capital structure and corporate control: The effect of antitakeover statutes on firm leverage. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 519-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00116

Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-156. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162

Grossman, S., & Hart, O. (1980). Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 42-64. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003400

Grossman, S., & Hart, O. (1982). Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. In J. McCall (Ed.), The economics of information and uncertainty (pp. 107-140). University of Chicago Press. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c4434

Hart, O. (1996). Theories of optimal capital structure: A managerial discretion perspective. In B. Allen (Ed.), Economics in a changing world (pp. 204-235). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25168-1_10

Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. The American Economic Review, 88(1), 96-118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/116820

Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76, 323-329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818789

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jensen, M., & Murphy, K. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-264. https://doi.org/10.1086/261677

Jiraporn, P., Chintrakarn, P., & Liu, Y. (2011). Capital structure, CEO dominance, and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Services Research, 42(3), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-011-0109-8

Jiraporn, P., & Liu, Y. (2008). Capital structure, staggered boards, and firm value. Financial Analysts Journal, 64(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v64.n1.7

La Bruslerie, H., & Latrous, I. (2012). Ownership structure and debt leverage: Empirical test of a trade-off hypothesis on French firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 22(4), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2012.06.001

Lemmon, M., Roberts, M., & Zender, J. (2008). Back to the beginning: Persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1575-1608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01369.x

Li, T., Munir, Q., & Karim, M. (2017). Nonlinear relationship between CEO power and capital structure: Evidence from China’s listed SMEs. International Review of Economics & Finance, 47, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.09.005

Mello, C., & Carvalho, A. (2014). Considerações sobre o controle difuso, as “poison pills” e as “hostile take over bids” no mercado de capitais brasileiro. In M. Siqueira (Org.), Brasil S/A: Guia de acesso ao mercado de capitais para companhias brasileiras (pp. 157-170). Donnelley Financial Solutions. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2578311

Morellec, E. (2003). Can managerial discretion explain observed leverage ratios? Review of Financial Studies, 17(1), 257-294. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg036

Murphy, K. (1985). Corporate performance and managerial remuneration. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 11-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90026-6

Novaes, W. (2003). Capital structure choice when managers are in control: Entrenchment versus efficiency. The Journal of Business, 76(1), 49-82. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/344113

Novaes, W., & Zingales, L. (1995). Capital structure choice when managers are in control: Entrenchment versus efficiency (NBER Working Paper 5384). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w5384/w5384.pdf

Pindado, J., & De La Torre, C. (2011). Capital structure: New evidence from the ownership structure. International Review of Finance, 11(2), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2443.2010.01115.x

Procianoy, J., & Schnorrenberger, A. (2004). A Influência da estrutura de controle nas decisões de estrutura de capital das companhias brasileiras. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 58, 122-146. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402004000100006

Rajan, R. & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x

Sampaio, T. (2022). Estrutura de capital, governança corporativa e concentração de propriedade das empresas brasileiras (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Federal do Ceará. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/66548

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1989). Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90099-8

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

Silveira, A., Perobelli, F., & Barros, L. (2008). Governança corporativa e os determinantes da estrutura de capital: Evidências empíricas no Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 12, 763-788. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552008000300008

Stulz, R. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90011-N

Tayachi, T., Hunjra, A., Jones, K., Mehmood, R., & Al-Faryan, M. (2021). How does ownership structure affect the financing and dividend decisions of firm? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(3), 729-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2021-0291

Tosun, O. (2015). The effect of CEO option compensation on the capital structure: A natural experiment. Financial Management, 45(4), 953-979. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12116

Vieira, K., Velasquez, M., Losekann, V., & Ceretta, P. (2011). A Influence da governança corporativa no desempenho e na estrutura de capital das empresas listadas na Bovespa. Revista Universo Contábil, 7(1), 46-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4270/ruc.20117

Zwiebel, J. (1996). Dynamic capital structure under managerial entrenchment. The American Economic Review, 86(5), 1197-1215. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118286

Publicado

2025-05-26

Número

Sección

Artículos Originales

Cómo citar

José Canassa, B., Diniz Schwarz, L. A., & Ribeiro do Valle, M. (2025). Leverage, entrenched managers, and moderating effect of main shareholder’s influence. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 36(97), e1979. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20241979.pt