The institutional interface between Brazilian Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance and Judiciary: analysis of judicial cases about medical care for emergencies in healthcare plans
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v17i1p122-144Keywords:
Emergency Care, Healthcare Plans, Judicial Review.Abstract
This article makes a descriptive analysis of judicial review of the regulations adopted by the Brazilian National Regulatory Agency for Private Health Insurance and Plans (ANS – in Portuguese) in relation to cases involving emergency coverage to health care plans users. Thus, it was made a review of judgments from courts of the states of São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais that focused on this topic and, as a result, it was found that the regulatory standard has been declared illegal by most members of these courts (except for a specific section in the Court of São Paulo). The results were discussed, based on the levels of judicial intervention and highlighting epistemic problems for the characterization of a medical emergency, as well problems to define its limits. As a conclusion, it was shown there is a clear need for a better regulatory standards and a harmonious institutional interface between the regulatory agency and the judiciary.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Revista de Direito Sanitário/ Journal of Health Law adopts the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internacional. This license allows to share - "copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially" and adapt - "remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially." Details at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en
