Health judicialization in the Brazilian state of Pernambuco: The antineoplastics at the top again?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v20i1p202-222

Keywords:

Antineoplastic Agents, Juridical Decisions, Right to Health, Health Expenditure, Public Health

Abstract

The medicines are among the most judicially demanded health resources. Antineoplastic drugs are among the therapeutic class with the higher number of lawsuits in some Brazilian states and compliance with these actions confers a certain financial impact to the Brazilian National Health System, since it entails excessive and unplanned expenditures. The objective of this article was to analyze the lawsuits for the acquisition of  antineoplastic drugs in the Health Department of the State of Pernambuco, in the year 2015. A retrospective descriptive study analyzed all the lawsuits related to antineoplastic drugs, issued from January to December 2015, at the Health Secretariat of the State of Pernambuco. This comprised a total of 347 lawsuits concerning a variety of 26 different antineoplastic drugs. The therapeutic subgroup of protein kinase inhibitors (25.9%) comprised the highest proportion, followed by monoclonal antibodies (22.2%). The expenditure on anti-neoplastic drugs of the Health Department of the State of Pernambuco’s for the year 2015 was over R$ 14 million. Regarding the origin of prescriptions, the highest percentage (57%) came from non-profit entities. A total of 58 different pathologies were indicated to justify legal actions. The issue became relevant because of the exponential expansion of neoplasms in the world and in Brazil because of (i) the accelerated pace of technological innovations of the pharmaceutical industry, in particular; (ii) the magnitude acquired by the access to treatments through judicialization in the State, and (iii) the consequent repercussion on public expenditure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Antonio Angelo Menezes Barreto, Federal University of Bahia

    Mestrando em Saúde Comunitária pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva do Instituto de Saúde Coletiva (ISC) da Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA); especialização pelo Programa de Residência Multiprofissional em Saúde Coletiva da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Recife; graduação em Farmácia pela UFBA. Salvador/BA, Brasil.

  • Diego Medeiros Guedes, Federal University of Pernambuco

    Mestrando em Inovação Terapêutica pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Inovação Terapêutica da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE); graduação em Farmácia pela UFPE. Assessor técnico do Núcleo de Ações Judiciais da Secretaria Estadual de Saúde de Pernambuco. Recife/PE, Brasil. 

  • José de Arimatea Rocha Filho, Federal University of Pernambuco

    Mestrado em Ciências Farmacêuticas pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE); graduação em Farmácia pela UFPE. Farmacêutico do Hospital das Clínicas/UFPE e do Hospital dos Servidores do Estado de Pernambuco. Recife/PE, Brasil.

References

Published

11/18/2019

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Barreto, A. A. M., Guedes, D. M., & Rocha Filho, J. de A. (2019). Health judicialization in the Brazilian state of Pernambuco: The antineoplastics at the top again?. Journal of Health Law, 20(1), 202-222. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.v20i1p202-222