Up, up and away! The metaphor of verticality and the moderating role of regulatory focus in price assessments

Authors

  • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife
  • Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo
  • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-05-2020-0042

Keywords:

Metaphor of verticality, regulatory focus, pricing decisions

Abstract

Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to analyze the effects of the metaphor of verticality on how individuals assess prices, having regulatory focus as a moderator of this relationship.

Design/methodology/approach: Two experiments were conducted with a 2x2 between-subjects design (metaphor of verticality: physically higher vs. physically lower x regulatory focus: promotion vs. prevention). The second study performed moderated mediation by incorporating the self-esteem variable.

Findings: The results show that the Treatment Group consisting of prevention-focused individuals who consider themselves physically higher assessed prices according to what was proposed for the study compared to the group consisting of promotion-focused individuals who consider themselves physically lower. Participants in Treatment Group 1 attributed the lowest prices to products, demanded more significant discounts in order to go to another store searching for a product and considered the prices more unfair.

Originality/value: The primary contribution of this study is to reveal that the position of one’s body on the vertical axis influences their thoughts and, therefore, their decision-making in the scope of products and services prices. Moreover, regulatory focus can attenuate such effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aaker, J. L. and Lee, A. Y. (2001), “‘I’ seek pleasure and ‘we’ avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28, pp. 33-49.

Aggarwal, P. and Zhao, M. (2015), “Seeing the big picture: the effect of height on the level of construal”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 120-133.

Argo, J. J. and White, K. (2012), “When do consumers eat more? The role of appearance self-esteem and food packaging cues”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 67-80.

Barone, M. J., Coulter, K. S., and Li, X. (2020), “The upside of down: presenting a price in a low or high location influences how consumers evaluate it”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 96, No. 3, pp. 397-410.

Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., and Vohs, K. D. (2003), “Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?”, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-44.

Campos, P. O., and Costa, M. F. (2021), “Regulatory focus and construal level theory on low-income consumer indebtedness: Evidence from an emerging market”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, ahead-of-print, p. 1-20.

Casasanto, D. and Bruin, A. (2019), “Metaphors we learn by: Directed motor action improves word learning”, Cognition, Vol. 182, pp. 177-183.

Chan, N. C. and Ho, Y. (2017), “The role of regulatory focus and goal progress on goal-directed consumption behaviors”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 147-155.

Costa, M. F., Angelo, C. F., and Farias, S. A. (2020), “Verticality, Regulatory Focus and Pricing: Who’s Able to Get a Good Deal?”, Brazilian Business Review, Vol. 17, pp. 309-327.

Freitas, A. L. and Higgins, E. T. (2002), “Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit”, Psychological Science, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1-6.

Genc, T. S., and Giovanni, P. D. (2021), “Dynamic pricing and green investments under conscious, emotional, and rational consumers”, Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, In press.

Hayes, A. F. (2013), “Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis”, New York: The Guildford Press.

Higgins, E. T. (1997), “Beyond pleasure and pain”, American Psychologist, Vol. 52, pp. 1280-1300.

Hong, J. and Lee, A.Y. (2008), “Be fit and be strong: mastering self-regulation through regulatory fit”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 34, pp. 682-695.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980), “Metaphors we live by”, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Li, H. and Cao, Y. (2017), “Who’s holding the moral higher ground: Religiosity and the vertical conception of morality”, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 106, pp. 178-182.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1984), “Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist”, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 341-350.

Krishna, A. and Schwarz, N. (2014), “Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: a review and introduction”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 159-168.

Lee, K., Choi, J., and Li, Y. J. (2014), “Regulatory focus as a predictor of attitudes toward partitioned and combined pricing”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 355-362.

Mantovani, D., and Tazima, D. I. (2016), “Visual art and regulatory fit messages on consumer evaluations”, Revista de Administração de Empresas, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 152-165.

Mayer, J. D. and Gaschke, Y. N. (1998), “The experience and meta-experience of mood”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 102-111.

Meier, B. P., Hauser, D. J., Robinson, M. D., Friesen, C. K. and Schjeldahl, K. (2007), “What’s “up” with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 93, No. 5, pp. 699-710.

Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N. and Bargh, J. A. (2012), “Embodiment in social psychology”, Trends in Cognitive Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 705-716.

Mittal, B. and Biswas, D. (2016), “Psychographics of comparison shoppers”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 20-31.

Ostinelli, M., Luna, D. and Ringberg, T. (2014), “When up brings you down: the effect of imagined vertical movements on motivation, performance, and consumer behavior”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 271-283.

Pham, M. T. and Chang, H. (2010), “Regulatory focus, regulatory fit, and the search and consideration of choice alternatives”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 626-640.

Santana, S., Thomas, M., and Morwitz, V. G. (2020), “The role of numbers in the customer journey”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 138-154.

Schubert, T. W. (2005), “Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 1-21.

Serpa, D. A. and Ávila, M. G. (2004), “Percepção entre preço e valor: um teste experimental”, RAE Eletrônica, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 1-19.

Shirai, M. (2017), “Effects of price reframing tactics on consumer perceptions”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 34, pp. 82-87.

Published

2023-05-08

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Up, up and away! The metaphor of verticality and the moderating role of regulatory focus in price assessments. (2023). REGE Revista De Gestão, 30(1), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-05-2020-0042