Control and motivation in task performance of public servants at home office in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

  • Cristiane Aparecida da Silva Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Fabricia Silva da Rosa Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-06-2021-0093

Keywords:

Output Control, Autonomous and Controlled Motivation, Task Performance, Home Office, COVID-19

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the influence of output control, autonomous motivation, and controlled motivation on task performance of public servants at home office owing to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methodology: Survey research, based on the perception of 236 public servants; Structural Equation Modeling technique was used for data analysis.

Results: Both autonomous motivation and output control are positively and significantly related to task performance.

Research implications: The present study expands the literature with information about individual performance and management control, which can be related to the control, motivation and task performance of public servants at home office in a pandemic context.

Practical implications: The results could offer a basis for understanding how managers can deal with the challenges while at home office. They can also provide managers with information that they can use to build management strategies to foster the performance of public servants at home office.

Social implications: Home office can decrease commuting to a central workplace, alleviate traffic problems, and reduce car pollution. It also allows for business continuity in the face of storms and pandemics.

Originality: Most studies about home office, COVID-19, and task performance have addressed personal, professional, and organizational characteristics. However, little is known about the analysis of combinations of the following constructs: output control, autonomous and controlled motivations, and how both affect task performance of public servants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68.

Al-Sakkaf, H. T. Z., & Stilley, J. (2019). Developing an integrated understanding of performance management in virtual teams.

Amilin, A. (2017). The impact of role conflict and role ambiguity on accountants’ performance: The moderating effect of emotional quotient.

Ansari, S.L. (1977). An integrated approach to control system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(77)90027-7

Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management control systems.

Baert, S., Lippens, L., Moens, E., Weytjens, J., & Sterkens, P. (2020). The COVID-19 crisis and telework: A research survey on experiences, expectations and hopes.

Bono, J., Judge, T. (2003). Self-Concordance at Work: Toward Understanding the Motivational Effects of Transformational Leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5).

Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt, N., & Borman, W.C. (Eds.). Personnel selection in organizations (p. 71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: what’s the difference? Journal of management studies, 39(1), 97-122.

Caillier, J. G. (2012). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a US federal government agency. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 461-480.

Campbell, D. J., & Furrer, D. M. (1995). Goal setting and competition as determinants of task performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(4), 377-389.

Castanha, E. T., Beuren, I. M., & Gasparetto, V. (2020). Influência da comunicação interna e do engajamento no desempenho de tarefas de servidores públicos. Revista Internacional de Relaciones Públicas, 10(20), 179-200.

Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences–second edition. 12 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 13.

Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2. ed. United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Cunha, M., Domingos, A., Rocha, V., & Torres, M. (2021). Quantos poderiam ter sido salvos? Efeitos do distanciamento social na COVID-19. Revista de Administração Pública, 55(1), 12-26.

Davila, T. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems' design in new product development. Accounting, organizations and society, 25(4-5), 383-409.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Cognitive evaluation theory. In Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (pp. 43-85). Springer, Boston, MA.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.

Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of applied psychology, 74(4), 580.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management science, 31(2), 134-149.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.

Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2005). The shifting locations of work: new statistical evidence on the spaces and places of employment. Work, employment and society, 19(2), 415-431.

Fernet, C., Guay, F., Senécal, C., & Austin, S. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and teacher education, 28(4), 514-525.

Flamholtz, E. (1996). Effective organizational control: a framework, applications, and implications. European Management Journal, 14, 596-611.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.

Gagné, M., & Koestner, R. (2002, April). Self-determination theory as a framework for understanding organizational commitment. In annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.

Groen, B. A., van Triest, S. P., Coers, M., & Wtenweerde, N. (2018). Managing flexible work arrangements: Teleworking and output controls. European Management Journal, 36(6), 727-735.

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling.

Hartig, T., Kylin, C., & Johansson, G. (2007). The telework trade-off: Stress mitigation vs. constrained restoration. Applied Psychology: An International Review., 56(2), 231–253.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.

Johari, J. & Yahya, K.K. (2016). Job characteristics, work involvement, and job performance of public servants. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(7), 554-575.

Koestner, R., Otis, N., Powers, T. A., Pelletier, L., & Gagnon, H. (2008). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and goal progress. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1201–1230.

Kurland, N. B., & Egan, T. D. (1999). Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organization Science, 10(4), 500-513.

Langevin, P., & Mendoza, C. (2013). How can management control system fairness reduce managers’ unethical behaviours? European Management Journal, 31(3), 209-222.

Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of management journal, 18(4), 824-845.

Lorange, P., & Scott Mor. Ms (1974). Framework for Management Control Systems. Sloan Management Review 16(1), 41-56

Mahama, H., & Cheng, M.M. (2013). The effect of managers' enabling perceptions on costing system use, psychological empowerment, and task performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(1), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-50333

McDonough III, E. F. (2000). Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross‐functional teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 17(3), 221-235.

Merchant, K. A. (1982). The control function of management. Sloan Management Review (Pre-1986), 23 (4), 43.

Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2012). Management control systems. harmadik ed. Harlow: Pearson.

Miller, George A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review. v. 101, n. 2, p. 343-352.

Ministério da Economia. Governo federal define novas regras para o teletrabalho (access on 25/Aug/2020).>> https://www.gov.br/economia/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2020/julho/governo-federal-define-novas-regras-para-o-teletrabalho

Motowidlo, S.J., & Van Scotter, J.R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475

Na-Nan, K., & Sanamthong, E. (2019). Self-efficacy and employee job performance: Mediating effects of perceived workplace support, motivation to transfer and transfer of training. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.

Nexo Jornal Ltda. Link to article: https://www.nexojornal.com.br/expresso/2020/03/11/O-home-office-como-sa%C3%ADda-contra-contamina%C3%A7%C3%B5es-do-coronav%C3%ADrus. (access on 23/Aug/2020).

Oliveira, T. C., Abranches, M. V., & Lana, R. M. (2020). (In) Segurança alimentar no contexto da pandemia por SARS-CoV-2. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 36, e00055220.

Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management accounting research, 10(4), 363-382.

Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833-848.

Peci, A., Avellaneda, C. N., & Suzuki, K. (2021). Respostas governamentais à pandemia da COVID-19. Revista de Administração Pública, 55(1), 1-11.

Peña, F. (2014). Propuesta de un sistema de control de gestión para las contralorías municipales del estado Carabobo (Master's thesis).

Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Penguin.

Porter, A. J., & Van den Hooff, B. (2020). The complementarity of autonomy and control in mobile work. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(2), 172-189.

Richardson, J., & McKenna, S. (2014). Reordering spatial and social relations: A case study of professional and managerial flexworkers. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 724-736.

Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Self-determination theory in human resource development: New directions and practical considerations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20(2), 133-147.

Roelofs, A. (2010). Attention and facilitation: Converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(2), 411–422.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.

Sanusi, Z. M., Iskandar, T. M., Monroe, G. S., & Saleh, N. M. (2018). Effects of goal orientation, self-efficacy and task complexity on the audit judgement performance of Malaysian auditors. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(5), 546–557

Slemp, G. R., Field, J. G., & Cho, A. S. (2020). A meta-analysis of autonomous and controlled forms of teacher motivation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121, 103459.

Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of management Journal, 35(2), 292-327.

Snyder, K. (2012). Enhancing telework: A guide to virtual leadership. Public Manager, 41(1), 11-14.

Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). Performance concepts and performance theory. Psychological management of individual performance, 23(1), 3-25.

Sotola, D. O., Pillay, P., & Gebreselassie, H. (2020). COVID-19 in Africa: a comparative analysis of early policy responses. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration.

Souza, G. E. D., & Beuren, I. M. (2018). Reflexos do sistema de mensuração de desempenho habilitante na performance de tarefas e satisfação no trabalho. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 29, 194-212.

Stirpe, L., & Zárraga-Oberty, C. (2017). Are High-Performance Work Systems always a valuable retention tool? The roles of workforce feminization and flexible work arrangements. European Management Journal, 35(1), 128-136.

Sundbo, J. (1996). The balancing of empowerment. A strategic resource-based model of organizing innovation activities in service and low-tech firms. Technovation, 16(8), 397-446.

Tabari, P., Amini, M., Moghadami, M., Moosavi, M. (2020). International Public Health Responses to COVID-19 Outbreak: A Rapid Review. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 45(3), 157-169.

Tessier, S., & Otley, D. (2012). A conceptual development of Simons’ Levers of Control framework. Management accounting research, 23(3), 171-185.

Vasilieva, E., Rubtcova, M., Kaisarova, V., Kaisarov, A., & Pavenkov, O. (2015). Personal Targets for Public Servants and Their Support the Governance's Performance Conception in Russia. International Review of Management and Marketing, 5(4).

Vélez, M. L., Sánchez, J. M., & Álvarez-Dardet, C. (2008). Management control systems as inter-organizational trust builders in evolving relationships: Evidence from a longitudinal case study. Accounting, Organizations and Society,33(7-8), 968-994.

Widener, S.K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7), 757-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001.

Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617.

Wiswanathan, M.; Sudman, S.; Johson, M. (2004). Maximum versus meaningful discrimination in scale response: implications for validity of measurement of consumer perception about products. Journal of Business Research. n. 57, p. 08-24.

World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: healthy parenting. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/healthy-parenting (accessed at 23/ago/2020).

Young, S. M., Du, F., Dworkis, K. K., & Olsen, K. J. (2016). It's all about all of us: The rise of narcissism and its implications for management control system research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(1), 39-55.

Zhang, Q., & Doll, W. J. (2001). The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: a causal model. European Journal of Innovation Management.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-10

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Control and motivation in task performance of public servants at home office in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. (2023). REGE Revista De Gestão, 30(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-06-2021-0093