Editorial: Mapping and structuring MCDM methods supporting research and practice in business and management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2025-214Descargas
Referencias
Almeida, V. V. A., Gomes, C. F. S., Pinochet, L. H. C., & dos Santos, M. (2025). Prioritization of investment order in Brazil among renewable energy sources: an analysis using the SWARA-MOORA-3NAG method. Journal of Modelling in Management, 20(2), 620-647. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-09-2023-0208
Jain, V., Sahay, R. R., & Nupur. (2025). TODIM with XGBOOST and MVO metaheuristic approach for portfolio optimization. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 16(2), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02610-6
Keenan, P. (2024). A scientometric analysis of multicriteria decision-making research. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(1), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2024.2354642
Kozłowska, J. (2022). Methods of multi-criteria analysis in technology selection and technology assessment: A systematic literature review. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 14(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0021
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455.
Pant, S., Garg, P., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Kumar, A., Sharma, H. K., & Klochkov, Y. (2024). AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making approach for monitoring health management practices in smart healthcare system. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 15(4), 1444–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-023-01904-5
Pinochet, L. H. C., Moreira, M. Â. L., Fávero, L. P., dos Santos, M., & Pardim, V. I. (2023). Collaborative work alternatives with ChatGPT based on evaluation criteria for its use in higher education: Application of the PROMETHEE-SAPEVO-M1 method. Procedia Computer Science, 221, 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.07.025
Pinochet, L. H. C., Lopes, N. S., Onusic, L. M., dos Santos, M., Pardim, V. I., & Francischini, A. S. N. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI on candidate selection: A two-phase methodological approach with CRITIC-WASPAS. Procedia Computer Science, 242, 920-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.274
Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS Publications.
Santos, M., Costa, I. P. de A., & Gomes, C. F. S. (2021). Multicriteria decision-making in the selection of warships: A new approach to the AHP method. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v13i1.833
Stanujkic, D., Popovic, G., Karabasevic, D., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., & Ulutaş, A. (2023). An integrated simple weighted sum product method—WISP. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(5), 1933–1944. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3075783
Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. 1st Edition, New York. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11032
Wątróbski, J., Ziemba, P., Jankowski, J., & Karczmarczyk, A. (2022). Sustainable cities and communities assessment using the DARIA-TOPSIS method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103456
Yalcin, A. S., Kilic, H. S., & Delen, D. (2022). The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121193
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 165–179.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Luis Hernan Contreras Pinochet, Marcos dos Santos, Stanujkic Dragisa

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.