Can environmental technologies and banking development generate green growth? Empirical evidence from 22 most polluted economies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-01-2025-0008

Keywords:

Climate change, Banking sector development, Environmental technology, Green growth, 22 countries, PMG-ARDL model

Abstract

Purpose

The primary objective of this study is to analyze the influence of environmental technology and banking sector development on green growth. Pursuing green and sustainable growth is imperative for combating climate change. Green growth is encouraged in the most polluting economies.

Design/methodology/approach

This study focuses on 22 of the world’s most polluting economies during the period 2004–2023. In this context, the Pooled Mean Group Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) was employed for empirical evaluation.

Findings

In the long term, technological innovation, particularly environmental patents and international trade play a central role in fostering ecological transition. However, financial resources such as bank deposits and stock market capitalization act as potential barriers when not directed towards sustainable projects. In the short term, complex dynamics emerge, highlighting the importance of the variables’ lagged effects.

Research limitations/implications

Although much research has been conducted on the individual determinants of green growth, few studies have examined the combined impact of environmental technologies and bank financing on this phenomenon. This highlights the need for joint analyses that consider environmental technological progress and banking financing mechanisms. Such an analysis would help us better understand their role in promoting sustainable and inclusive green growth.

Practical implications

The onus is for the public decision-maker to establish a more advanced development policy that considers environmental sustainability.

Originality/value

The present study demonstrates the correlation between the adoption of environmental technologies and financial systems on the one hand, and the promotion of green growth on the other. It has the capacity to facilitate collaboration between the fields of environment and economy, thereby contributing to the sustainable development goals (SDGs), especially SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) and SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Clean Power Association, (2025), Report from the American Clean Power Association, https://cleanpower.org/america-builds-power/

Aghion, P., Dechez Le prêtre, A., Hémous, D., Martin, R. and Van Reenen, J. (2016), “Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 124No. 1, pp. 1-51.

Álvarez-Herránza, A., Cantos, J. M., Belsalobre Lorente, D. and Shahbaz, M. (2017a), “Energy Innovations-GHG Emissions Nexus: Fresh Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries”, Energy Policy, No. 101, pp.90-100. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.030

Alvarez-Herranz, A., Balsalobre-Lorente,D., Cantos, J. M. and Shahbaz, M. (2017b), “Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels”, Energy Policy, No.105, pp.386-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.009

Amuakwa-Mensah, F. and Näsström, E. (2022), “Role of banking sector performance in renewable energy consumption”, Applied Energy, Vol. 306, issue PB, No. S0306261921013222.

Bank Track (2020), Banking on Climate Change: Fossil, Fuel, Finance Report Card 2020, https://www.banktrack.org/news/banking_on_climate_change_fossil_fuel_finance_report_card_2020, DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132865

Chen, X., Fu, R., Lee, J., and Wang, L. (2020). Academic self‐perceptions and academic achievement in Chinese children: A multiwave longitudinal study. Child Development, Vol. 91No. 5, pp. 1718–1732. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13360

Chen, T., F., Zhe, Huafu, Z. and Kening, W. (2020), “Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas”, Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 711 No. 134687, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134687

Demir, C., Cergibozan, R. and Ari, A. (2020), “Environmental dimension of innovation: time series evidence from Turkey”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 2497–2516.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-00305-0

Economic Social Commission for Asia and Pacific, ESCAP (2006), Green growth at a glance: the way forward for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations

Erdogan, S., Yıldırım, S., Çağrı Yıldırım, D. and Gedikli, A. (2020), “The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 267No. 110637, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637.

Gallego-Álvarez, I. and Pucheta-Martinez, M. C. (2019), “An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, Vol. 26No.3, pp. 612-627, DOI:10.1002/csr.1707

Hashmi, R. and Alam, K. (2019), “Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation”, Journal of cleaner production, No. 231, 1100-1109.

Huang, Q. and Liu, M. (2022), “Trade openness and green total factor productivity: testing the role of environment regulation based on dynamic panel threshold model”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 24 No 7, pp. 9304–9329

Initiative Finance Climat (ICF, 2021), 2021 UK Climate Finance Results, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-climate-finance-results-2021/2021-uk-climate-finance-results

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2023), IPCC, 2023: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1-34, DOI: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001

Koçak, K. and Ulucak, Z. S. (2019), “The effect of Energy R and D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 26, pp. 14328-14338.

Li, Q., Zhang, H. and Hong, X. (2020), “Knowledge structure of technology licensing based on co-keywords network: A review and future directions”, International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 66, pp. 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.11.007

Li, J., Dong, X. and Dong, K. (2022a), “Is China’s green growth possible? The roles of green trade and green energy”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Vol. 35 Issue 1, pp. 7084-7108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2058978

Li, J., Jiang, T., Ullah, S. and Majeed, M. T. (2022b), “The dynamic linkage between financial inflow and environmental quality: evidence from China and policy options”, Environmental Science Pollution Research, Vol. 29 No 1, pp. 1051–1059, DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-15616-5

Li, T. and Liao, G. (2020), “The heterogeneous impact of financial development on green total factor productivity”, Frontiers in Energy Research, Vol. 8 No 29, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00029

Lin, T., Wu, C., Chen, L. and Wang, W. (2020), “How do environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings influence corporate credit ratings? Evidence from panel data”, Journal of Business Research, No. 112, pp.1-11.

Liu, H., Zhang, J. and Wang, Z. (2023), “Promoting renewable energy investments through international cooperation”, World Economic Forum, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 456-470.

Liu, L., Schuster, G. L., Moosmüller, H., Stamnes, S., Cairns, B. and Chowdhary, J. (2022), “Optical properties of morphologically complex black carbon aerosols: Effects of coatings”, journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Vol. 281, 10808, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2022.108080

Londeix, M. (2019) « Et si notre avenir passait por la finance verte ? », https://meritis.fr/finance/avenir-passait-finance-verte/.

Oil Change International (2024), Banking on Climate Chaos 2024: Fossil Fuel Finance Report, pp. 61, http://oilchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/BOCC_2024_vF1.pdf

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2020), Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity, OECD Environment Statistics, https://doi.org/10.1787/55a11744-en

People's Bank of China (PBOC, 2021), PBOC Launches Green Loan Program to Support Environmental Projects, November 10, 2021, https://greencentralbanking.com/2021/11/10/pboc-launches-targeted-green-lending/

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. P. (1999), “Pooled mean group estimation of dynamicheterogeneous panels”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 94 No 446, pp. 621-634.

Solarin, S. A., Tiwari, A. K. and Bello, M. O. (2019), “A multi-country convergence analysis of ecological footprint and its components”, Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 46, April 2019, 101422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101422

Talebzadeh Hosseini, S. and Garibay, I. (2022), “The interaction effects of technological innovation and path-dependent economic growth on countries overall green growth performance”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 333, 130134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130134

Ullah, K. N., Zhongyi, P., Ullah, A. and Mumtaz, M. (2024), “A comprehensive evaluation of sustainable mineral resources governance in Pakistan: An analysis of challenges and reforms”, Resources Policy, Vol. 88 No.104383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104383

Wang, C., Li, Z., Chen, X., Yuyao, Y., Wang, F. and Kaihuai, L. (2024), “The impact of digital economy on industrial carbon emission efficiency at the city level in China: Gravity movement trajectories and driving mechanisms”, Environmental Technology and Innovation, Vol. 33 No. 103511, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103511

Wen, Q., Chen, Y., Jingke, H. and Chen, Y. (2020), “Spillover effect of technological innovation on CO2 emissions in China’s construction”, Building and Environment, Vol. 171No. 1, 106653, DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106653

Xu, B. and Lin, B. (2018), “Assessing the development of China's new energy industry”, Energy Economics, Vol. 70, pp. 116-131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.001

Yu, Y. and Du, Y. (2019), “Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘New Normal’ economy in China”, Atmospheric Pollution Research, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 152-161.

Zhang, T., Li, W. and Chen, D. (2023), “Challenges and opportunities in financing renewable energy projects in developing countries”, Journal of Sustainable Energy Development, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp.45- 60.

Zhou, G., Zhu, J. and Luo, S. (2022), “The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China: mediating effect of green finance”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 193, 107308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107308

World Bank (2021), The Economic Costs of Natural Disasters: 1980-2020, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2021, World Bank.

World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO (2023), WIPO IP Facts and Figures 2023, pp. 39, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-943-2023-en-wipo-ip-facts-and-figures-2023.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Can environmental technologies and banking development generate green growth? Empirical evidence from 22 most polluted economies. (2025). REGE Revista De Gestão, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-01-2025-0008