ThinkBox: Integrating generative artificial intelligence into graduate studies in administration: impacts, ethical dilemmas, and methodological paths

Balasubramanian, N., Ye, Y., & Xu, M. (2022). Substituting human decision-making with machine learning: Implications for organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 47(3), 448–465.

Buriak, J. M., Akinwande, D., Artzi, N., Brinker, C. J., et al. (2023). Best practices for using AI when writing scientific manuscripts: Caution, care, and consideration—Creative science depends on it. ACS Nano, 17(5), 4091–4093.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632

Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613(7944), 423.

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2022). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. In S. Carta (Ed.), Machine Learning and the City. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch45

Heidt, A. (2025). AI for research: The ultimate guide to choosing the right tool. Nature, 640(8058), 555–557. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01069-0

Knox, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence and education in China. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 298–311.

Mohamed, S., Png, M.-T., & Isaac, W. (2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 33, 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8

Sampaio, R. C., Sabattini, M., & Limongi, R. (2024). Guidelines for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence: A practical guide for researchers. São Paulo: Editora Intercom. Available from: https://www.portcom.intercom.org.br/ebooks/detalheEbook.php?id=57203

Schmidgall, S., Su, Y., Wang, Z., Sun, X., Wu, J., Yu, X., Liu, J., Moor, M., Liu, Z., & Barsoum, E. (2025). Agent Laboratory: Using LLM agents as research assistants. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04227

SciSpace. (2025). SciSpace: AI-powered platform for discovering, analyzing, and writing scientific literature. PubGenius Inc. Retrieved August 19, 2025, from https://scispace.com

Stanford University. (2025). Responsible AI (Section of the 2025 AI Index Report). Retrieved August 19, 2025, from Stanford Human-Centered AI website: https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2025-ai-index-report/responsible-ai

Stokel-Walker, C. (2023, January 18). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613(7945), 620–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z

Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313.

Williamson, B., Bayne, S., & Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in higher education: Critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.

Zhai, X. (2024). Transforming teachers' roles and agencies in the era of generative AI: Perceptions, acceptance, knowledge, and practices. (Preprint available at arXiv:2410.03018).