Editorial: Generative AI, human authorship and the transformation of scholarly communication

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2026-0058

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrews, D.S., Fainshmidt, S. and Gaur, A. (2026), “Progress or perish: International business and the adoption of artificial intelligence”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 61 No. 1, p. 101689, doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101689.

Arsenyan, J. and Piepenbrink, A. (2024), “Artificial Intelligence Research in Management: A Computational Literature Review”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 71, pp. 5088–5100, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3229821.

Barman, K.G., Wood, N. and Pawlowski, P. (2024), “Beyond transparency and explainability: on the need for adequate and contextualized user guidelines for LLM use”, Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 26 No. 3, p. 47, doi: 10.1007/s10676-024-09778-2.

Bechky, B.A. and Davis, G.F. (2025), “Resisting the Algorithmic Management of Science: Craft and Community After Generative AI”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 1–22, doi: 10.1177/00018392241304403.

Bolaños, F., Salatino, A., Osborne, F. and Motta, E. (2024), “Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges”, Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 57 No. 10, p. 259, doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10902-3.

Brown, O., Davison, R.M., Decker, S., Ellis, D.A., Faulconbridge, J., Gore, J., Greenwood, M., et al. (2024), “Theory‐Driven Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Business and Management”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 3–23, doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12788.

Delios, A., Li, J., Schotter, A.P.J. and Vrontis, D. (2024), “Challenging the orthodoxy in international business research: Directions for ‘new’ research areas”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 59 No. 4, p. 101552, doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2024.101552.

Delios, A., Tung, R.L. and Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2025), “How to intelligently embrace generative AI: the first guardrails for the use of GenAI in IB research”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 451–460, doi: 10.1057/s41267-024-00736-0.

Draxler, F., Werner, A., Lehmann, F., Hoppe, M., Schmidt, A., Buschek, D. and Welsch, R. (2024), “The AI Ghostwriter Effect: When Users do not Perceive Ownership of AI-Generated Text but Self-Declare as Authors”, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Association for Computing Machinery, Vol. 31 No. 2, doi: 10.1145/3637875.

Dwivedi, Y. and Helal, M. (2026), Research with AI: A Simple Step-by-Step Practical Guide.

Dwivedi, Y.K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E.L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A.K., Baabdullah, A.M., et al. (2023), “Opinion Paper: ‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 71, p. 102642, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

Dwivedi, Y.K., Malik, T., Hughes, L. and Albashrawi, M.A. (2024), “Scholarly Discourse on GenAI’s Impact on Academic Publishing”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 0 No. 0, pp. 1–16, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2024.2435386.

Eke, D.O. (2023), “ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?”, Journal of Responsible Technology, Vol. 13, p. 100060, doi: 10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060.

Gatrell, C., Muzio, D., Post, C. and Wickert, C. (2024), “Here, There and Everywhere: On the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Management Research and the Peer‐Review Process”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 61 No. 3, pp. 739–751, doi: 10.1111/joms.13045.

Heersmink, R. (2024), “Use of large language models might affect our cognitive skills”, Nature Human Behaviour, Nature Publishing Group, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 805–806, doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01859-y.

Helal, M.Y.I., Elgendy, I.A., Albashrawi, M.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Al-Ahmadi, M.S. and Jeon, I. (2025), “The impact of generative AI on critical thinking skills: a systematic review, conceptual framework and future research directions”, Information Discovery and Delivery, doi: 10.1108/IDD-05-2025-0125.

Herhausen, D., Ludwig, S., Abedin, E., Haque, N.U. and De Jong, D. (2025), “From words to insights: Text analysis in business research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 198, p. 115491, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115491.

Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, L.M. and Resnik, D.B. (2024), “Using AI to write scholarly publications”, Accountability in Research, Vol. 31 No. 7, pp. 715–723, doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535.

Ignjatović, A. and Stevanović, L. (2023), “Efficacy and limitations of ChatGPT as a biostatistical problem-solving tool in medical education in Serbia: a descriptive study”, Vol. 20.

Kulkarni, M., Mantere, S., Vaara, E., Van Den Broek, E., Pachidi, S., Glaser, V.L., Gehman, J., et al. (2024), “The Future of Research in an Artificial Intelligence-Driven World”,Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 207–229, doi: 10.1177/10564926231219622.

Kumar, S. and Gunn, A. (2025), “Doctoral students’ reflections on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in the literature review process”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 1395–1408, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2024.2427049.

Lindebaum, D. and Fleming, P. (2024), “ChatGPT Undermines Human Reflexivity, Scientific Responsibility and Responsible Management Research”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 566–575, doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12781.

Magalhães, A.P.T., Magalhães, D.V., Nussenzveig, P.A., Camarotto, R.L., Ferretti-Rebustini, R.E. de L. and Torresi, S.I.C de. (2026), Guia de Boas Práticas Científicas - 3a edição, 3rd ed., Rebeca Leite Camarotto, São Paulo, SP.

Ngwenyama, O. and Rowe, F. (2024), “Should We Collaborate with AI to Conduct Literature Reviews? Changing Epistemic Values in a Flattening World”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 37–181, doi: 10.17705/1jais.00869.

Okina, M. (2024), “Exploring ethical frontiers:: a survey into the prevalecence of artificial intelligence in academic writing”, Journal of Computer Sciences and Informatics, Vol. 1 No. 1, p. 1, doi: 10.5455/JCSI.20240515052807.

Pinochet, L.H.C., Moreira, M.Â.L., Fávero, L.P., Santos, M. dos and Pardim, V.I. (2023), “Collaborative Work Alternatives with ChatGPT Based on Evaluation Criteria for its Use in Higher Education: Application of the PROMETHEE-SAPEVO-M1 Method”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 221, pp. 177–184, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.07.025.

Pinochet, L.H.C., Schnaider, P.S.B. and Carvalho, J.V.F. (2025), “Editorial: Pressures and dilemmas in scientific publishing in management: building rigor, relevance, and global impact”, Revista de Gestão, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 2–6, doi: 10.1108/REGE-01-2025-212.

Thomas, L.D.W., Romasanta, A.K.G. and Pujol Priego, L. (2026), “Jagged competencies: Measuring the reliability of generative AI in academic research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 203, p. 115804, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115804.

Tosi, D. (2025), “Comparing Generative AI Literature Reviews Versus Human-Led Systematic Literature Reviews: A Case Study on Big Data Research”, IEEE Access, Vol. 13, pp. 56210–56219, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3554504.

Wobst, J. and Lueg, R. (2025), “Avoiding algorithm errors in textual analysis: A guide to selecting software, and a research agenda toward generative artificial intelligence”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 199, p. 115571, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115571.

Wong, R.S.-Y. (2024), “ChatGPT in Medical Education: Promoting Learning or Killing Critical Thinking?”, Education in Medicine Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 177–183, doi: 10.21315/eimj2024.16.2.13.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-23

Issue

Section

Editorial

How to Cite

Editorial: Generative AI, human authorship and the transformation of scholarly communication. (2026). REGE Revista De Gestão, 33. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2026-0058