ThinkBox: An Open Government Agenda for Academics

Autores

  • Gabriela de Breláz UNIFESP Osasco, Department of Administração https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9954-5526
  • Suzanne J. Piotrowski Rutgers University Newark, School of Public Affairs and Administration (SPAA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2025-215

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Abers, R.N. (2019). Bureaucratic Activism: Pursuing Environmentalism Inside the Brazilian State. Latin American Politics and Society. 2019;61(2):21-44. doi:10.1017/lap.2018.75

Berliner, D., Ingrams, A., & Piotrowski, S. (2019). The future of FOIA in an open government world: Implications of the open government agenda for freedom of information policy and implementation. Villanova Law Review, 63, 867.

Bezerra, C. P., Almeida, D. R., Gurza Lavalle, A., & Dowbor, M. (2024). Between Deinstitutionalization and Resilience: Institutional Participation in the Bolsonaro Administration. Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 67,1-47.

Brelaz, G., & Alves, M. A. (2013). The process of institutionalization of participation in the City House of São Paulo: an analysis of budget public hearings (1990 to 2010). Revista de Administração Pública, 47, 803-826, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122013000400001

Brelaz, G., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2024). Open Government? Democracy and Transparency Backsliding in Latin America’s Populist Governments. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 89. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n89.a396

Brelaz , G.; Dias, T. F., Reinecke, L. , Nascimento, A. B., & Rodrigues, D. C. (2025). Governo Aberto: Caminhos para transparência, dados abertos, participação, colaboração e accountability. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 30, e92960. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v30.92960

Brelaz, G.; Annunziata, R.; Ribeiro, A.; Spicer, Z. (2025). Co-creation in open government plans: a comparative study between Buenos Aires, São Paulo and Toronto. International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM) Conference. Universitá di Bologna, Italy.

Bua, A., & Bussu, S. (2023). Introduction to the volume. In A. Bua & S. Bussu (Eds.), Reclaiming participatory governance: Social movements and the reinvention of democratic innovation (pp. 1-12). Routledge

Cervellini, S., Adams, K., Rodrigues, M., & Sendretti, L. (2024). Citizens’ assemblies in Brazil: An analysis of the role of mini-publics on building democratic participatory climate public policies. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2369907

Crantschaninov, T. I., & Souza Guimarães Marques, C. (2025). Construção da estratégia nacional de governo digital: Participação social e federativa. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 30, e90817. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v30.90817

Cruz Rubio, C. N., & Alujas, A. R. (2024). Rendición pública de cuentas: Métodos y experiencias inspiradoras en España y América Latina. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press.

Elsevier/Scopus. (2024). Metrics. https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/metrics

Fernandes, G. A.; Fernandes, I. F. & Teixeira, M. A. (2023). Transparency of subnational governments: The impact of inequality on transparency. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 57(6).

Gao, Y., Janssen, M., & Zhang, C. (2023). Understanding the evolution of open government data research: Towards open data sustainability and smartness. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211009

Grin, E. J., Fernandes, G., Teixeira, M. A. C., & Angelico, F. (2024). The paths of corruption in Brazilian municipalities: Where they come from and where they are going. In O. Meza & E. Pérez-Chiqués (Eds.), The structure of systemic corruption: How corruption consolidates in local governments.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020). Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101497.

Gurza Lavalle, A., Guicheney, H., & Bezerra, C. P. (2024). Difusão e operação dos conselhos municipais nos estados: Regimes de normatização e seus efeitos. Opinião Pública, 30, 1-35.

Gurza Lavalle, A., & Szwako, J. (2023). Social movements and modes of institutionalization. In F. M. Rossi (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Latin American social movements. Oxford University Press.

Kamath, U., Keenan, K., Somers, G., & Sorenson, S. (2024). Large language models: A deep dive: Bridging theory and practice. Springer.

Lerner, J. (2024). Making democracy fun: Exploring how game design can empower citizens and transform politics. The MIT Press.

Lima, F. N., & da Silva Craveiro, G. (2025). Intersecções entre Governo Aberto e educação política. Cadernos Gestão Pública E Cidadania, 30, e90829. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v30.90829.

Langella, C., Anessi-Pessina, E., Botica Redmayne, N., & Sicilia, M. (2021). Financial reporting transparency, citizens' understanding, and public participation: A survey experiment study. Public Administration, 101(2), 584–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12804

Lourenço, R. P.; Piotrowski, S.; Ingrams, A. (2017). Open data driven public accountability. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11 (1), 42-57

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. The Free Press, 227p.

Marx, A., Bart C., & Benoit R. (2013). Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Organizational Studies. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 38, 23–47

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organization: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 440–463.

National Science Foundation. (2024). Publication output by region, country, or economy and by scientific field. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202333/publication-output-by-region-country-or-economy-and-by-scientific-field

Open Government Partnership. (2019). OGP local engagement strategy approved by the OGP Steering Committee on 29 May 2019. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/SC_Local-Strategy_20190529.pdf

Oszlak, O. (2025). Open state: An emerging concept. In Research handbook on open government. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301652.00027.

Porto de Oliveira, O. (2021). Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation. 1. ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 470p.

Porumbescu, G., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2022). Government transparency: State of the art and new perspectives. Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.

Piotrowski, S., Berliner, D., & Ingrams, A. (2022). The power of partnership in open government: Reconsidering multistakeholder governance reform. The MIT Press.

Ragin, C., Shulman, D., Weinberg A. & Gran, B. (2003) Complexity, Generality, and Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Field Methods, 15(4), 323–340.

Romão, W. de M., Rodrigues, M., & Serafim, L. (2025). Co-creation and social participation: Analysis of the Six Brazilian Open Government Partnership Action Plans (2011-2023). Cadernos Gestão Pública E Cidadania, 30, e90830 . https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v30.90830

Scott, R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests. London: Sage.

Tai, K. (2021). Open government research over a decade: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101566.

Tatagiba, L. (2002). Os Conselhos Gestores e a democratização das políticas públicas no Brasil. In: Dagnino, E. (Org.). Sociedade civil e espaços públicos no Brasil. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 47-105.

Wampler, B., & Goldfrank, B. (2022). Rise, spread, and decline of Brazil's participatory budgeting. Springer International Publishing.

Publicado

2025-07-22

Edição

Seção

Section Thinkbox

Como Citar

ThinkBox: An Open Government Agenda for Academics. (2025). REGE Revista De Gestão, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2025-215