ThinkBox: An Open Government Agenda for Academics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-04-2025-215Downloads
Referências
Abers, R.N. (2019). Bureaucratic Activism: Pursuing Environmentalism Inside the Brazilian State. Latin American Politics and Society. 2019;61(2):21-44. doi:10.1017/lap.2018.75
Berliner, D., Ingrams, A., & Piotrowski, S. (2019). The future of FOIA in an open government world: Implications of the open government agenda for freedom of information policy and implementation. Villanova Law Review, 63, 867.
Bezerra, C. P., Almeida, D. R., Gurza Lavalle, A., & Dowbor, M. (2024). Between Deinstitutionalization and Resilience: Institutional Participation in the Bolsonaro Administration. Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 67,1-47.
Brelaz, G., & Alves, M. A. (2013). The process of institutionalization of participation in the City House of São Paulo: an analysis of budget public hearings (1990 to 2010). Revista de Administração Pública, 47, 803-826, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122013000400001
Brelaz, G., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2024). Open Government? Democracy and Transparency Backsliding in Latin America’s Populist Governments. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 89. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n89.a396
Brelaz , G.; Dias, T. F., Reinecke, L. , Nascimento, A. B., & Rodrigues, D. C. (2025). Governo Aberto: Caminhos para transparência, dados abertos, participação, colaboração e accountability. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 30, e92960. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v30.92960
Brelaz, G.; Annunziata, R.; Ribeiro, A.; Spicer, Z. (2025). Co-creation in open government plans: a comparative study between Buenos Aires, São Paulo and Toronto. International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM) Conference. Universitá di Bologna, Italy.
Bua, A., & Bussu, S. (2023). Introduction to the volume. In A. Bua & S. Bussu (Eds.), Reclaiming participatory governance: Social movements and the reinvention of democratic innovation (pp. 1-12). Routledge
Cervellini, S., Adams, K., Rodrigues, M., & Sendretti, L. (2024). Citizens’ assemblies in Brazil: An analysis of the role of mini-publics on building democratic participatory climate public policies. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2369907
Crantschaninov, T. I., & Souza Guimarães Marques, C. (2025). Construção da estratégia nacional de governo digital: Participação social e federativa. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 30, e90817. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v30.90817
Cruz Rubio, C. N., & Alujas, A. R. (2024). Rendición pública de cuentas: Métodos y experiencias inspiradoras en España y América Latina. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press.
Elsevier/Scopus. (2024). Metrics. https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/metrics
Fernandes, G. A.; Fernandes, I. F. & Teixeira, M. A. (2023). Transparency of subnational governments: The impact of inequality on transparency. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 57(6).
Gao, Y., Janssen, M., & Zhang, C. (2023). Understanding the evolution of open government data research: Towards open data sustainability and smartness. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211009
Grin, E. J., Fernandes, G., Teixeira, M. A. C., & Angelico, F. (2024). The paths of corruption in Brazilian municipalities: Where they come from and where they are going. In O. Meza & E. Pérez-Chiqués (Eds.), The structure of systemic corruption: How corruption consolidates in local governments.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2020). Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101497.
Gurza Lavalle, A., Guicheney, H., & Bezerra, C. P. (2024). Difusão e operação dos conselhos municipais nos estados: Regimes de normatização e seus efeitos. Opinião Pública, 30, 1-35.
Gurza Lavalle, A., & Szwako, J. (2023). Social movements and modes of institutionalization. In F. M. Rossi (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Latin American social movements. Oxford University Press.
Kamath, U., Keenan, K., Somers, G., & Sorenson, S. (2024). Large language models: A deep dive: Bridging theory and practice. Springer.
Lerner, J. (2024). Making democracy fun: Exploring how game design can empower citizens and transform politics. The MIT Press.
Lima, F. N., & da Silva Craveiro, G. (2025). Intersecções entre Governo Aberto e educação política. Cadernos Gestão Pública E Cidadania, 30, e90829. https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v30.90829.
Langella, C., Anessi-Pessina, E., Botica Redmayne, N., & Sicilia, M. (2021). Financial reporting transparency, citizens' understanding, and public participation: A survey experiment study. Public Administration, 101(2), 584–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12804
Lourenço, R. P.; Piotrowski, S.; Ingrams, A. (2017). Open data driven public accountability. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11 (1), 42-57
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. The Free Press, 227p.
Marx, A., Bart C., & Benoit R. (2013). Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Organizational Studies. Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 38, 23–47
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organization: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 440–463.
National Science Foundation. (2024). Publication output by region, country, or economy and by scientific field. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202333/publication-output-by-region-country-or-economy-and-by-scientific-field
Open Government Partnership. (2019). OGP local engagement strategy approved by the OGP Steering Committee on 29 May 2019. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/SC_Local-Strategy_20190529.pdf
Oszlak, O. (2025). Open state: An emerging concept. In Research handbook on open government. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035301652.00027.
Porto de Oliveira, O. (2021). Handbook of Policy Transfer, Diffusion and Circulation. 1. ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 470p.
Porumbescu, G., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2022). Government transparency: State of the art and new perspectives. Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.
Piotrowski, S., Berliner, D., & Ingrams, A. (2022). The power of partnership in open government: Reconsidering multistakeholder governance reform. The MIT Press.
Ragin, C., Shulman, D., Weinberg A. & Gran, B. (2003) Complexity, Generality, and Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Field Methods, 15(4), 323–340.
Romão, W. de M., Rodrigues, M., & Serafim, L. (2025). Co-creation and social participation: Analysis of the Six Brazilian Open Government Partnership Action Plans (2011-2023). Cadernos Gestão Pública E Cidadania, 30, e90830 . https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v30.90830
Scott, R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests. London: Sage.
Tai, K. (2021). Open government research over a decade: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101566.
Tatagiba, L. (2002). Os Conselhos Gestores e a democratização das políticas públicas no Brasil. In: Dagnino, E. (Org.). Sociedade civil e espaços públicos no Brasil. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 47-105.
Wampler, B., & Goldfrank, B. (2022). Rise, spread, and decline of Brazil's participatory budgeting. Springer International Publishing.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Gabriela de Breláz, Suzanne J. Piotrowski

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.