Evaluation of the double diffusion, enzyme immunoassay and immunoblotting techniques, for the diagnosis of human hydatid disease in tropical areas

Authors

  • Sandra Planchart UCV; Instituto de Medicina Tropical
  • Carlos Botto UCV; Instituto de Medicina Tropical
  • Belkis Alarcon de Noya UCV; Instituto de Medicina Tropical
  • Rosario Bonifacino /Instituto de Higiene/Montevideo; Departamento de Parasitología
  • Livia Vivas UCV; Instituto de Medicina Tropical
  • Lilian Spencer UCV; Instituto de Medicina Tropical
  • Sarai Vivas UCV; Instituto de Medicina Tropical

Keywords:

Hydatid Disease, Cross Reactivity, Double Diffusion, ELISA, Immunoblotting

Abstract

Hydatid disease in tropical areas poses a serious diagnostic problem due to the high frequence of cross-reactivity with other endemic helminthic infections. The enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the double diffusion arc 5 showed respectively a sensitivity of 73% and 57% and a specificity of 84-95% and 100%. However, the specificity of ELISA was greatly increased by using ovine serum and phosphorylcholine in the diluent buffer. The hydatic antigen obtained from ovine cyst fluid showed three main protein bands of 64,58 and 30 KDa using SDS PAGE and immunoblotting. Sera from patients with onchocerciasis, cysticercosis, toxocariasis and Strongyloides infection cross-reacted with the 64 and 58 KDa bands by immunoblotting. However, none of the analyzed sera recognized the 30 KDa band, that seems to be specific in this assay. The immunoblotting showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% when used to recognize the 30 KDa band.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1994-06-01

Issue

Section

Serology

How to Cite

Planchart, S., Botto, C., Alarcon de Noya, B., Bonifacino, R., Vivas, L., Spencer, L., & Vivas, S. (1994). Evaluation of the double diffusion, enzyme immunoassay and immunoblotting techniques, for the diagnosis of human hydatid disease in tropical areas . Revista Do Instituto De Medicina Tropical De São Paulo, 36(3), 205-210. https://revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/29155