Factors associated with extensions and withdrawals from stricto sensu graduate programs in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic: emphasis on mental health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7988.4754Keywords:
Graduate Education; Mental Health; COVID-19; Universities; Teaching; Risk FactorsAbstract
Objective: to analyze the factors associated with extension of the completion deadline and the course withdrawals by Brazilian students enrolled in stricto sensu graduate programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, with emphasis on mental health. Method: cross-sectional analytical study conducted with 5,286 graduate students enrolled in 2022. Data were collected through an electronic form that contained sociodemographic, academic, and health information, including a history of mental disorders. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression through R software. Results: the study found that 38% of participants extended their courses and 4.8% withdrew from enrollment. Extension was associated with pursuing a doctorate, studying Engineering or Biological Sciences, reporting training difficulties, and presenting mental health problems. Participation in remote classes and a previous diagnosis of hypertension emerged as protective factors. Withdrawal was associated with having children, studying Engineering, facing pandemic difficulties, presenting mental health problems, and having a history of academic leave. Being a scholarship holder was a protective factor, reducing the chances of withdrawal by 50%. Conclusion: the findings indicate that extensions and withdrawals are related to academic, personal and health factors, highlighting the need for institutional policies that promote comprehensive support, with special attention to mental health and retention in graduate programs.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.