Meanings of quality of life held by patients with colorectal cancer in the context of chemotherapy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0455.2572Abstract
;;OBJECTIVE:;; this study's aim was to interpret the meanings assigned to quality of life by patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.
;;;;METHOD:;; the ethnographic method and the medical anthropology theoretical framework were used. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and participant observations with 16 men and women aged from 43 to 75 years old undergoing chemotherapy in a university hospital.
;;;;RESULTS:;; the meanings and senses describe biographical ruptures, loss of normality of life, personal and social suffering, and the need to respond to chemotherapy's side effects; chemotherapy is seen as a transitional stage for a cure. Quality of life is considered unsatisfactory because the treatment imposes personal and social limitations and QoL is linked to resuming normal life.
;;;;CONCLUSIONS:;; the meanings show the importance of considering sociocultural aspects in the conceptualization and assessment of quality of life.
;;Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.