Reliability analysis of the Manchester Triage System: inter-observer and intra-observer agreement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2205.3005Keywords:
Nursing, Emergency Medical Services, Triage, Nursing Assessment, Reproducibility of Results, Validity of TestsAbstract
Objective: To analyze the reliability of the Manchester Triage System to determine the priority of patients in emergency services. Method: This is a reliability study with a sample of 361 nurses. The data were collected in three stages and the questionnaires were applied using the electronic software. The agreement was measured by the evaluation of clinical cases. The outcomes evaluated were agreement with the gold standard and intra-observer in the indication of the flowchart, discriminator, and level of risk. Data were submitted to univariate and bivariate analyses. The agreement was measured by the Kappa index. Results: The external and internal reliability of the protocol ranged from moderate to substantial (Kappa: 0.55-0.78). The time of professional experience as a nurse, in emergency services and in the classification of risk were associated with external and internal reliability. The correct choice of the discriminator influenced the correct indication of the risk level (R² = 0.77, p <0.0001) more than the correct choice of the flowchart (R² = 0.16, p <0.0001). Conclusion: The reliability of the Manchester Triage System ranged from moderate to substantial and it was influenced by the clinical experience of the nurse. The protocol is safe for defining clinical priorities using different classification flowcharts.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2018-01-01
Issue
Section
Original Articles
License
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
How to Cite
Souza, C. C. de, Chianca, T. C. M., Cordeiro Júnior, W., Rausch, M. do C. P., & Nascimento, G. F. L. (2018). Reliability analysis of the Manchester Triage System: inter-observer and intra-observer agreement. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 26, e3005. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2205.3005