Systematic review of topic treatment for venous ulcers

Authors

  • Eline Lima Borges Minas Gerais Federal University; College of Nursing
  • Maria Helena Larcher Caliri Minas Gerais Federal University; College of Nursing
  • Vanderlei José Haas Collaborating Center for Nursing Research Development

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000600017

Keywords:

varicose ulcer, evidence-based medicine, review literature

Abstract

Venous ulcer patients can experience this situation for several years without achieving healing if treatment is inadequate. Evidence-based professional practice generates effective results for patients and services. This research aimed to carry out a systematic review to assess the most effective method to improve venous return and the best topic treatment for these ulcers. Studies were collected in eight databases, using the following descriptors: leg ulcer, venous ulcer and similar terms. The sample consisted of 33 primary studies and two Meta-analyses. A wide range of treatments was identified, grouped in compression therapy (54.3%) and topical treatment (45.7%). It was evidenced that compression therapy increases ulcer healing rates and should be used in patients with intact arteries. There is no consensus about the best topical treatment, although different options should be associated with compression therapy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-12-01

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 6 (2007)

Section

Review Articles

License

RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.
Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
 Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.

 

How to Cite

Systematic review of topic treatment for venous ulcers. (2007). Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 15(6), 1163-1170. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000600017