Analysis of scientific production of mental health researcher and psychiatric nursing specialist meetings

Authors

  • Denize Bouttelet Munari Goiás Federal University; School of Nursing
  • Nunila Ferreira de Oliveira University of São Paulo; Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing
  • Toyoko Saeki WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development
  • Maria Conceição Bernardo deMello e Souza WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692008000300022

Keywords:

psychiatric nursing, mental health, nursing research

Abstract

This literature review was organized on the basis of the Annals of Mental Health Researcher and Psychiatric Nursing Specialists Meetings promoted by the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing. It aimed to describe the history of these events, investigating the scenario and trends through the reading of texts published in these documents. All annals available from 1990 to 2004 were analyzed and read, based on an analysis protocol. The results showed that the published texts reflect the historical momentum of each national mental health policy movement in Brazil, indicating contradictions and advances. The conclusion is that the events provided a privileged forum to discuss and exchange experiences about the future of psychiatric nursing and mental health care, teaching and research in Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-06-01

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2008)

Section

Review Articles

License

RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.
Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
 Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.

 

How to Cite

Analysis of scientific production of mental health researcher and psychiatric nursing specialist meetings. (2008). Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 16(3), 471-476. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692008000300022