Peripheral venipuncture: evaluating the performance of nursing professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692005000300003Keywords:
punctures, infusions, intravenous, nursing, teamAbstract
This inferential comparative study aimed to evaluate the performance of nursing professionals during the execution of the peripheral venipuncture procedure with a view to verifying convergences and identifying risk factors that can predispose to the occurrence of complications. Data were collected through structured observation, by means of a checklist with 25 items. In order to evaluate the average number of correct performances in the three professional categories, the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric statistical test was used with a 5% significance level. In those cases where a difference was found, multiple comparison tests were carried out. The sample consisted of 55 nursing professionals who were observed while performing the respective procedure three times every other day. An average of 78% of globally correct performances was found across the categories. However, the specific global average for each category corresponded to: 82% for nurses, 80% for nursing technicians and 77% for nursing auxiliaries. In relation to the 25 items of the venipuncture procedure, 10 presented significant errors, 4 of which presented p < 0.05. The data point out the need to intensify education activities that promote a change in nursing professionals' behavior, thus favoring a quality performance of the peripheral venipuncture procedure.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2005-06-01
Issue
Section
Original Articles
License
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
How to Cite
Peripheral venipuncture: evaluating the performance of nursing professionals. (2005). Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 13(3), 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692005000300003