Non-pharmacological interventions to promote the sleep of patients after cardiac surgery: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0000.4099Abstract
Regarding the article “Non-pharmacological interventions to promote the sleep of patients after cardiac surgery: a systematic review”, with DOI number: 10.1590/1518-8345.1917.2926, published in the Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, 2017;25:e2926, page 1:
Where was written:
“ 1 Paper extracted from Master’s Thesis “Evidence of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of sleep pattern changes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review”, presented to Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.”
Now read:
“ 1 Paper extracted from Master’s Thesis “Evidence of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of sleep pattern changes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review”, presented to Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - Finance Code 001, Brazil.”
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
