Health dashboard for information management in cervical cancer screening
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7084.4447Keywords:
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Papanicolau Test , Primary Health Care , Information Products and Services , Health Information Management , NursingAbstract
Objective: to create a digital health dashboard for information management in the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of cervical cancer screening. Method: the study developed a technological production based on User-Centered Design, using fictitious data from cytopathological exams performed by women between 25 and 64 years old in Primary Health Care. The study complied with the requirements regarding copyright, ethics, and data protection. Results: the model was created on the Looker Studio® platform. The developed health dashboard is intended for use by nurses, professionals, and health managers. The dashboard’s usability simulations were carried out in fictitious cities. The dashboard optimizes access to information management in near real-time and presents a comprehensive health situation for health planning, monitoring, and evaluation. The model is reusable, which makes it a powerful tool for opportunistic and organized screening activities in the context of Primary Health Care. Conclusion: the health dashboard model as an information management tool allows nurses, professionals and health managers to make decisions to improve cervical cancer screening.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
