Use of personal protective equipment among nurses in the pre- and post-COVID-19 vaccination periods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7510.4732Keywords:
Personal Protective Equipment; Nurses; COVID-19; Pandemics; Personal Protection; Disease PreventionAbstract
Objective: compare the use of personal protective equipment among nurses in the pre- and post-COVID-19 vaccination periods in the state of Paraíba, Brazil. Method: cross-sectional, analytical study with nurses from the state of Paraíba, Brazil. Data collection in two periods (pre- and post-COVID-19 vaccination), online, using a survey instrument. Descriptive and comparative analyses. Comparative analysis of variables for combined use of personal protective equipment in direct care and aerosol-generating procedures for people with suspected or diagnosed COVID-19 using the Z-test for proportions. Results: participation of 579 nurses in period 1 and 734 nurses in period 2. Gloves, face shield, N95 mask, surgical cap, and gown were the pieces of equipment most used by nurses in the care of people with suspected and/or diagnosed COVID-19. The combined use of personal protective equipment was higher in the pre-vaccination period compared with post-vaccination period. Conclusion: combined use of personal protective equipment by nurses decreased after the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine. Thus, it is necessary to implement educational strategies and trainings on the proper use of these pieces of equipment.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
