Effectiveness of audiovisual interventions in increasing knowledge about sexually transmitted infections: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7531.4705Keywords:
Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Audiovisual Aids; Video-Audio Media; Sexually Transmitted DiseasesAbstract
Objective: to analyze the evidence on the effectiveness of audiovisual interventions in increasing knowledge about sexually transmitted infections in different age groups. Method: systematic review, conducted on February 21, 2023, in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Nursing Database, Spanish Bibliographic Index in Health Sciences, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Experimental studies that used audiovisual resources to improve knowledge were included, compared with other interventions or none. The synthesis of results was narrative, with assessment of risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Results: the sample consisted of 25 studies (10 randomized clinical trials and 15 quasi-experimental studies). Educational videos were the most widely used resource. Compared to other interventions or no intervention, the intervention group achieved significant improvements in knowledge in the medium and long term, as well as changes in perception and predisposition to reduce risky behavior. The certainty of the evidence was low for randomized studies and very low for quasi-experimental studies. Conclusion: audiovisual interventions have shown effectiveness in different populations and age groups, highlighting the need to consider specific parameters in creating these resources.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.