Development of a clinical protocol for detection of cervical cancer precursor lesions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2340.2999Keywords:
Cervical Intraephitelial Neoplasia, Clinical Protocol, Validation Studies as Topic, Cervical Cancer Prevention, Women’s Health, NursingAbstract
Objective: to develop and validate the content of a clinical protocol aimed at prevention of cervical cancer in primary care. Method: technological research according to the steps: (1) submission of the project to the research ethics committee; (2) bibliographic survey; (3) elaboration of the clinical protocol; and (4) content validation. In the third step, the information was collected through bibliographic research and gynecology specialists were consulted. For the final step, four judges were selected to evaluate the clinical protocol according to AGREE 2. Domains that reached the minimum level of agreement of 75% in the scores were considered validated. Results: the scores obtained in each domain of the instrument were as follows: domain 1 (scope and purpose) = 87.5%; domain 2 (stakeholder involvement) = 83.3%; domain 3 (development rigor) = 79.7%; domain 4 (clarity of presentation) = 76.3%; domain 5 (applicability) = 78.1%; and domain 6 (editorial independence) = 85.4. Conclusion: the clinical protocol proved to be a validated material with scores above the minimum required. The protocol obtained positive recommendations with modifications and went through adjustments in order to make it more effective.Downloads
Downloads
Published
2018-01-01
Issue
Section
Original Articles
License
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
How to Cite
Development of a clinical protocol for detection of cervical cancer precursor lesions. (2018). Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 26, e2999. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2340.2999