Model proposal for calculating waste associated with processing consigned surgical instruments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6716.4063

Keywords:

Perioperatory Nursing; Costs and Cost Analysis; Elective Surgical Procedures; Health Assessment; Hospital Costs; Sterilization

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the waste generated from processing surgical instruments consigned in elective orthopedic surgeries and propose a model for calculating waste associated with processing consigned surgical instruments. Method: a quantitative, descriptive-exploratory case study carried out in a large university hospital in two phases: (1) retrospective by consulting administrative records of canceled elective orthopedic surgeries, with provision for the use of consigned materials for identification of the sub-specializations with the greatest demand; and (2) prospective through direct, non-participant observations of processing consigned surgical instruments prepared for the identified surgeries and proposition of a model for calculating waste associated with processing these materials. Results: hip arthroplasty, spine arthrodesis and knee arthroplasty surgeries were identified as presenting the greatest demand, resulting in 854 boxes of consigned surgical instruments processed and unused. Processing waste was estimated at R$34,340.18 (US$6,359.30). Conclusion: the proposed equation made it possible to calculate the waste related to the production and non-use of boxes of surgical instruments consigned for orthopedic procedures and can equip nurses for planning based on institutional, care and financial data, aiming to make better use of resources through waste identification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-04

Issue

Vol. 31 (2023)

Section

Original Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.
Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
 Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.

 

How to Cite

Lopes, S. G., & Poveda, V. de B. (2023). Model proposal for calculating waste associated with processing consigned surgical instruments. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 31, e4063. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6716.4063