Adherence to antiretroviral treatment in adults with HIV: knowledge translation in website creation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7196.4642Keywords:
HIV; Treatment Adherence and Compliance; Adult; Educational Technology; Translational Science, Biomedical; NursingAbstract
Objective: to create a website to promote adherence to antiretroviral treatment for adults living with the human immunodeficiency virus. Method: methodological research in which the content was developed based on the synthesis of scientific evidence and validated by experts on the subject. The image content was created and linked to the text content for the development of the website. The analysis was performed based on the Content Validity Index by 20 experts recruited using the snowball technique. Results: the content was structured into three axes: self-efficacy, social support and quality of life. Each axis presents a concept, a total of 11 Life Situations with proposals for promoting adherence and 14 images. The overall Content Validity Index obtained a score >0.78. The website is freely accessible. Conclusion: the educational-care technology typified as an informative website was validated by experts on the subject for use by the target population of adults living with the human immunodeficiency virus as a tool for promoting adherence to antiretroviral treatment.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.