Risk factors for harmful alcohol consumption: a multilevel analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7763.4687Keywords:
Health; Prevalence; Mental Health; Primary Health Care; Alcohol-Induced Disorders; Drug UsersAbstract
Objective: to identify the prevalence of alcohol consumption patterns among Primary Health Care users and the association between risky, harmful, and probable dependence consumption patterns with sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics. Method: cross-sectional study conducted with a sample of 2,178 participants who responded to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in primary health care services in the city of São Paulo. Descriptive and multiple inferential statistical analysis was performed using a hierarchical Poisson regression model with a significance level of 5%. Results: of the total number of participants, 18.9% met the criteria for harmful alcohol consumption. Determinants for risky and harmful alcohol consumption were male gender (PR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.57–2.28; p < 0.001), black race/color (PR = 1.65; 95% CI 1.30 - 2.10; p < 0.001), and income ≥ 10 minimum wages (PR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.07 - 2.99; p = 0.028). For probable dependence, lower educational level (PR = 13.70; 95% CI 1.56–117.63; p = 0.017) and reporting a diagnosis of depression (PR = 2.72; 95% CI 1.37–5.41; p = 0.005) were determinants. Conclusion: the prevalence of alcohol use disorders among users of primary health care services in São Paulo was higher than that observed in previous studies, suggesting that this segment of the population seeks health care at these services, highlighting the potential for screening and early diagnosis of the population.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.