Motivations, benefits, and barriers to the use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis based on the health belief model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7357.4654Keywords:
HIV; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Disease Prevention; Health Belief Model; Nursing; Sexually Transmitted DiseasesAbstract
Objective: to understand the motivations, benefits, and barriers to the use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. Method: a qualitative study grounded on the Health Belief Model. Sixteen people using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis were followed up at two Testing and Counseling Centers in a large municipality in the interior of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Data were collected through individual audio-recorded interviews. Data analysis followed Rosenstock’s Health Belief Model and Bardin’s Content Analysis. Results: susceptibility to HIV was influenced by uncertainty about partners’ serology and condom failure. The severity of HIV is perceived as greater due to its incurability. Benefits include greater protection, safety, and well-being. Barriers involve difficulties in access, side effects, and social stigma. Conclusion: the study revealed that the motivation for using Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis was the perception of susceptibility to HIV, the severity of the disease, and benefits such as protection and psychological well-being, while barriers involved difficulties in access, complexity of the clinical protocol, and stigma. Knowing the beliefs and barriers can favor more effective interventions by the health team.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.