Frailty and nursing care demand in hospitalized older adults: a cross-sectional study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7747.4717Keywords:
Nursing Care; Hospitalization; Frailty; Nurses Improving Care for Health System Elders; Frail Elderly; Cross-Sectional StudiesAbstract
Objective: to analyze the relation between nursing care demand and frailty condition and markers in hospitalized older adults. Method: analytical cross-sectional study with a sample of 400 older adults. Data collection used a sociodemographic questionnaire, frailty phenotype tests, and a nursing care complexity assessment scale. Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s test were applied, considering statistical significance for p≤0.05. Results: there was a predominance of pre-frail (48.7%), followed by frail (35.8%) and non-frail individuals(15.5%). Most frail older adults required high-dependency nursing care (44.8%). The minimum nursing care demand was 80.6% for non-frail, 60.5% for pre-frail, and 14% for frail older adults. Frail older adults required higher nursing care level than the non-frail in the areas: mental state, oxygenation, motility, ambulation, elimination, and therapy (p<0.001). There was association between minimal to intensive nursing care demand and reduced hand grip strength (p<0.001), reduced gait speed (p<0.001), fatigue/exhaustion (p<0.001), reduced physical activity level (p<0.001), and unintentional weight loss (p<0.019). Conclusion: higher nursing care demand was associated with worse frailty condition and markers. Frailty assessment is indispensable to trace specific needs and support nursing care planning.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
