Childbirth types: women's expectations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692002000500007Keywords:
childbirth, cesareanAbstract
This descriptive and exploratory study was carried out through interviews with 221 puerperal women who gave birth in Sao Paulo State public maternities located within the capital. The purposes of the work were: 1. to identify the type of childbirth women expected to have - whether vaginal births or cesareans - and why; 2. to verify to what extent women's expectations corresponded to the type of birth they had; 3. to compare medical indications for c-sections with women's understanding of justifications they were given for this intervention. Data revealed that 74.7% of the women expected to have vaginal births and 25.3% expected to have cesarean sections. Vaginal birth, expected by 165 interviewees, occurred in 66.1% of these cases. Among women who expected having vaginal births, the most mentioned justification was that recuperation afterwards was faster. Among women who expected cesareans, the most mentioned justification was a previous c-section. The justifications presented by 61 women for having been submitted to c-sections did not coincide with medical indications for this intervention in 47.5% of the cases.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2002-10-01
Issue
Section
Original Articles
License
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.
How to Cite
Oliveira, S. M. J. V. de, Gonzalez Riesco, M. L., Rosas Miya, C. F., & Vidotto, P. (2002). Childbirth types: women’s expectations. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 10(5), 667-674. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692002000500007