Transition experiences of patients and families upon discharge from intensive care: a scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7919.4763Keywords:
Patient Discharge; Patient-Centered Care; Continuity of Patient Care; Transitional Care; Patient Participation; Patient TransferAbstract
Objective: to map available evidence on the experiences of adult patients and family members regarding the transition of care between intensive care and inpatient units. Method: scoping review conducted according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Primary studies, reviews, dissertations, and theses published in Portuguese, English, or Spanish were included, with no time limit. The final search was conducted on health portals and databases and in digital libraries. The selection was performed by two reviewers in a blind and independent manner. The data were extracted using a script and presented in figures, descriptive and deductive qualitative analysis, categorizing the experiences between the stages of assessment, planning, execution, and follow-up after discharge. Results: thirty articles comprised the sample. The experiences mapped highlight the transition as a critical moment in hospitalization, marked by emotional impact and informational weaknesses. Reports of unpreparedness, feelings of abandonment, and communication failures compromise the continuity of care and the adaptation of patients and family members. Conclusion: the experiences described point to the transition of care between intensive care and inpatient units as a complex and multifaceted process. The gaps identified require structured communication strategies, timely information, and alignment between units.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.