Mapping nursing goals of an Intensive Care Unit to the Nursing Outcomes Classification

Authors

  • Tânia Couto Machado Chianca Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Escola de Enfermagem
  • Patrícia de Oliveira Salgado Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Escola de Enfermagem
  • Juliana Peixoto Albuquerque Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Escola de Enfermagem
  • Camila Claudia Campos Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Escola de Enfermagem
  • Meire Chucre Tannure Pontifícia Universidade Católica
  • Flávia Falci Ercole Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Escola de Enfermagem

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692012000500006

Keywords:

Nursing, Nursing Process, Intensive Care Units, Validation Studies, Nursing Assessment

Abstract

AIM: to analyze whether nursing goals formulated for nursing diagnoses can be mapped to nursing outcomes classification and to identify the scales most appropriate to the outcomes mapped. METHOD: a descriptive study was developed in an intensive care unit. Data collection involved extraction of goals in 44 medical records, content standardization, cross-mapping to the outcomes, identification of appropriated scales and validation. Descriptive analysis and agreement with the cross-mapping process were performed. RESULTS: nursing goals (59) were mapped to (28) different outcomes, with agreement of 83% in the mapping process. All goals were mapped to outcomes, which allows to affirm that these outcomes contemplates the goals elaborated to patient care. CONCLUSION: these results favor the inclusion of outcomes and scales validated in the planning and evaluation phases of the nursing process of a software in construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2012-10-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Chianca, T. C. M., Salgado, P. de O., Albuquerque, J. P., Campos, C. C., Tannure, M. C., & Ercole, F. F. (2012). Mapping nursing goals of an Intensive Care Unit to the Nursing Outcomes Classification. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 20(5), 854-862. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692012000500006