Bioplastics value chain and blockchain: reducing transaction costs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-12-2023-0253Keywords:
Second-generation bioplastics, Blockchain, Transaction costs, Circular economy, Biodegradable, Value chain transparencyAbstract
PurposeThis paper aims to identify and explain the main transaction costs (TCs) in the second-generation bioplastics value chain and to propose the insertion of blockchain technology to reduce TCs.
Design/methodology/approachIt is a holistic single case study of a firm that produces a bioplastic resin made from açaí seeds residues. It analyzed transactions occurred between input supplier (cooperative) and resin factory and between resin factory and transformation industry.
FindingsDominant TCs result from monitoring specific attributes of pretreated açaí seeds and biopolymers, supplier selection, environmental purchasing, time and place specificity, quality control management and technological specificity.
Research limitations/implicationsBlockchain can potentially reduce TCs by enhancing trust, transparency, material traceability and information exchange.
Practical implicationsBlockchain can support the further development and commercialization of genuine biodegradable bioplastics by assuring product quality and functioning as a distributed database for stakeholders, minimizing a specific type of opportunism: “greenwashing”.
Social implicationsThis study can help create metrics and policies to achieve the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal related to consumption and production patterns by doing better with less and increasing resource efficiency while contributing to strengthening Brazil’s circular (bio)economy.
Originality/valueThis study’s originality lies in framing the most important challenges regarding TCs in developing bioplastics chains, which can be significantly reduced using a particular distributed database technology.
Downloads
References
Ali, S.S., Elsamahy, T., Abdelkarim, E.A., Al-Tohamy, R., Kornaros, M., Ruiz, H.A., Zhao, T., Li, F., & Sun, J. (2022). Biowastes for biodegradable bioplastics production and end-of-life scenarios in circular bioeconomy and biorefinery concept. Bio-resource. Technology. 363 (2022), 127869.
Allen, D. W. (1991). What Are Transaction Costs? Research In Law and Economics 14, 1991: 1–18.
Bachmann, M., Zibunas, C., Hartmann, J., et al. (2023). Towards circular plastics within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability 6, 599–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01054-9
Barbato, A. G. & Pamplona, J. P. (2022). Os desafios para a difusão dos bioplásticos no Brasil. Revista Gestão e Sustentabilidade Ambiental., v. 11 n. 3, p. 365-390, Sept. 2022.
Barzel, Y. (1982). Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets. Journal of Law and Economics, 25 (1), 27-48.
Barzel, Y. (2000). The Role of Contract in Quality Assurance. CAFRI: Current Agriculture, Food and Resource Issues. Canadian Agricultural Economics Society, 1, 1-10.
Bishop, G., Styles, D., & Lens, P. N. L. (2022). Land-use change and valorisation of feedstock side- streams determine the climate mitigation potential of bioplastics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 180, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106185
Böckel, A., Nuzum, A.-K., & Weissbrod, I. (2021). Blockchain for the Circular Economy: Analysis of the Research-Practice Gap. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.006
Broeren, M. L., Kuling, L., Worrell, E., & Shen, L. (2017). Environmental impact assessment of six starch plastics focusing on wastewater-derived starch and additives, Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 127 246e255.
Campos, J. G. F. de & Mello, A. M. de. (2017). Transaction costs in environmental purchasing: Analysis through two case studies. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.12660/joscmv10n1p87-102
Chauhan, C., Parida, V., & Dhir, A. (2022). Linking circular economy and digitalisation technologies: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121508
Chou, C.-C., Richard Hwang, N.-C., Li, C.-W., Wang, T., & Wang, Y.-Y. (2023). Implementing a multichain framework using hyperledger for supply chain transparency in a dynamic partnership: A feasibility study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 175, 108906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108906
Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.
Cunha, C. F. da, Saes, M. S. M., & Mainville, D. Y. (2013). Análise de complexidade nas estruturas de governança entre supermercados e produtores agrícolas convencionais e orgânicos no Brasil e nos Estados Unidos: a influência do custo de transação e de mensuração. Revista de Administração, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1092
Derigent, W. & Thomas, A. (2016). End-of-Life Information Sharing for a Circular Economy: Existing Literature and Research Opportunities. In: Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Thomas, A., & McFarlane, D. (Eds.) Service orientation in holonic and multi-agent manufacturing, vol. 640. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 41–50.
Dias, M. F., Silva, A. C., & Nunes, L. J. R. (2021). Transaction Cost Theory: a Case Study in the Biomass-to-Energy Sector. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 8(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-00174-0
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, v.14, n.4, p.532-550.
Greve, F., Sampaio, L., Abijaude, J., Coutinho, A., Valcy, I., & Queiroz, S. (2018). Blockchain e a revolução do consenso sob demanda. Minicursos do Simpósio Brasileiro de Redes de Computadores e Sistemas Distribuídos, Edição: XXXVI, Capítulo 5, Sociedade Brasileira de Computação.
Gulati, R. & Singh, H., (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly 43, (4), 781-814.
Hobbs, J.E. & Young, L.M. (2000). Closer vertical coordination in agrifood supply chains: A conceptual framework and some preliminary evidence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 5. 131-143. 10.1108/13598540010338884.
Iles, A. & Martin, A. N. (2013). Expanding bioplastics production: Sustainable business innovation in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.008
Jayakumar, A., Radoor, S., Siengchin, S., Shin, G. H., & Kim, J. T. (2023). Recent progress of bioplastics in their properties, standards, certifications and regulations: A review. Science of the Total Environment (Vol. 878). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163156
Kawashima, N., Yagi, T., & Kojima, K. (2021). Pilot-Scale Composting Test of Polylactic Acid for Social Implementation. Sustainability, 13(4), 1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041654
Langois, R. N. (1992). Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1(1), 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/1.1.99
Khadke, S., Gupta, P., Rachakunta, S., Mahata, C., Dawn, S., Sharma, M., Verma, D., Pradhan, A., Krishna, A. M. S., Ramakrishna, S., Chakrabortty, S., Saianand, G., Sonar, P., Biring, S., Dash, J. K., & Dalapati, G. K. (2021). Efficient Plastic Recycling and Remolding Circular Economy Using the Technology of Trust–Blockchain. Sustainability, 13(16), 9142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169142
Kim, S.-K., & Huh, J.-H. (2020). Blockchain of Carbon Trading for UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 12(10), 4021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104021
Kolb, J., AbdelBaky, M., Katz, R. H., & Culler, D. E. (2020). Core concepts, challenges, and future directions in blockchain: A centralized tutorial. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(1).
Lazzarini, S., Chaddad, F., & Cook, M. (2001). Integrating supply chain and network analyses: The study of netchains. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 1(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2001.x002
Lukosevicius, A. P., Marchisotti, G. G., & Soares, C. A. P. (2017). Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Online) ISSN: 1679-9127, v. 16, n.2, ed. 31, Jul-Dez 2017.
Moreno, B. B., Rodrigues, B. V., Afonso, L. R., Jimenez, P. C., & Castro, Í. B. (2023). High incidence of false biodegradability claims related to single-use plastic utensils sold in Brazil. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 41, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.07.024
Mongabay (2021). Global demand for açaí is destroying Amazon floodplain forests. Access on 11/17/2023.
Napper, I.E. & Thompson, R.C. (2019). Environmental deterioration of biodegradable, oxobiodegradable, compostable, and conventional plastic carrier bags in the sea, soil, and open-air over a 3-year period. Environmental Science Technology. 53, 4775–4783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06984
Nazareth, M., Marques, M.R.C., Leite, M.C.A., & Castro, T.B. (2019). Commercial plastics claiming biodegradable status: Is this also accurate for marine environments? J. Hazard.Mater. 366, 714–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.052.
Nair, L., Gibbert, M., & Hoorani, B. (2023). Of Talking Pigs and Black Swans: Single Holistic Case Study Design. In Combining Case Study Designs for Theory Building: A New Sourcebook for Rigorous Social Science Researchers (pp. 31-49).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009023283.003
Pakseresht, A., Yavari, A., Kaliji, S. A., & Hakelius, K. (2023). The intersection of blockchain technology and circular economy in the agrifood sector. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.002
Persson, L., Carney Almroth, B. M., Collins, C. D., Cornell, S., de Wit, C. A., Diamond, M. L., Fantke, P., Hassellöv, M., MacLeod, M., Ryberg, M. W., Søgaard Jørgensen, P., Villarrubia-Gómez, P., Wang, Z., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2022). Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(3), 1510–1521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04158
Putri, A. N., Hariadi, M., & Wibawa, A. D. (2020). Smart Agriculture Using Supply Chain Management Based On Hyperledger Blockchain. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 466(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/466/1/012007
Ravi, D., Ramachandran, S., Vignesh, R., Falmari, V. R., & Brindha, M. (2022). Privacy preserving transparent supply chain management through Hyperledger Fabric. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 3(2), 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100072
Raimondi, V. (2022). Blockchain Technology & CSR Compliance: How to Build a System Based on Cooperation Among Stakeholders and Save Important Resources. Strategica. Shaping the Future of Business and Economy.
Rindfleisch, A. (2020). Transaction Cost Theory: Past, Present and Future. AMS Review, 10, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-019-00151-x
Riordan, M. H. & Williamson, O. E. (1985). Asset specificity and economic organization.International Journal of Industrial Organization. Volume 3, Issue 4, 365-378, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(85)90030-X.
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261
Scheiterle, L., Ulmer, A., Birner, R., & Pyka, A. (2018). From commodity-based value chains to biomass-based value webs: The case of sugarcane in Brazil’s bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3851–3863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.150
Schmidt, C. G. & Wagner, S. M. (2019). Blockchain and supply chain relations: A transaction cost theory perspective. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25(4), 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100552
Serrapilheira (2019). Basic research on açaí seeds yields green patent to biologist. Access on 11/17/2023.
Sklaroff, J.M. (2017). Smart contracts and the cost of inflexibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 166, 263.
Taherdoost, H. (2023). Smart Contracts in Blockchain Technology: A Critical Review. Information 14, 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ info14020117
Toledo, L. A. & Shiaishi, G. F. de. (2009). Estudo de caso em pesquisas exploratórias qualitativas: um ensaio para a proposta de protocolo de estudo de caso. Revista da FAE, v.12, n.1, p.103-119, jan./jun. 2009.
Upadhyay, A., Mukhuty, S., Kumar, V., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126130
Williamson, O. (1991). Comparative economic organisation: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, New York, v. 36, p. 269-296.
Williamson, O. (1985). The Economics Institution of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press. 449p.
Williamson, O. E. (1996). Mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams, A.T. & Rangel-Buitrago, N. (2022). The past, present, and future of plastic pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 176, 113429.
Yin, R. K (2005). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 3.ed. Porto Alegre (Brazil): Bookman.
Zylbersztajn, D. (2017). Agribusiness systems analysis: Origin, evolution and research perspectives. Revista de Administração, 52(1), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.10.004
Zylbersztajn, D. & Nadalini, L. B. (2007). Explaining Agro-Industrial Contract Breaches: The Case of Brazilian Tomatoes Processing Industry. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 45, no 04, p. 899-920, out/dez 2007.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eduarda Lara Mendonça Moreira, Andrei Domingues Cechin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution
