Using the internet for data collection in business research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2021-251Downloads
Referências
Atay, A. (2020). What is cyber or digital autoethnography? International Review of Qualitative
Research, 13(3), 267–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940844720934373.
Barends, A. J., & Vries, R. E. (2019). Noncompliant responding: Comparing exclusion criteria in MTurk
personality research to improve data quality. Personality and Individual Differences, 143(1), 84–
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.015.
Beaudry, I. S., & Gile, K. J. (2020). Correcting for differential recruitment in respondent-driven sampling
data using ego-network information. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 14(2), 2678–2713. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1214/20-EJS1718.
Cantrell, M. A., & Lupinacci, P. (2007). Methodological issues in online data collection. Journal of
Advanced Nursing, 60(5), 544–549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04448.x.
Cheung, J. H., Burns, D. K., Sinclair, R. R., & Sliter, M. (2017). Amazon mechanical Turk in
organizational psychology: an evaluation and practical recommendations. Journal of Business
and Psychology, 32(4), 347–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9458-5.
Churchill, G. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2005). Marketing research: methodological foundations, 9th ed., p. 697.
Mason, OH: Thomson.
Follmer, D. J., Sperling, R. A., & Suen, H. K. (2017). The role of MTurk in education research:
Advantages, issues, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 329–334. doi: https://
doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17725519.
Handcock, M. S. Fellows, I. E., & Gile, K. J. (2019). RDS: Respondent-Driven sampling. R package
version 0.9-2. Retrieved from:
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RDS
Heckathorn, D. D. (2011). Snowball versus respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 41(1),
–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01244.x.
Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Netnography: the essential guide to qualitative social media research, SAGE
Publications Limited.
Lefever, S., Dal, M., & Matthíasd
ottir, A. (2007). Online data collection in academic research:
Advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574–582. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x.
Lester, J. N. (2020). Going digital in ethnography: Navigating the ethical tensions and productive
possibilities. Cultural Studies $ Critical Methodologies, 20(5), 414–424. doi: https://doi.org/
1177/1532708620936995.
Pedhazur, E., & Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach,
pp. 819. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates. p
Rukmana, D. (2014). Quota sampling. In A. C. Michalos, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and WellBeing
research, Dordrecht: Springer.
Statista Portal. (2020). Global digital population as of October 2020. Retrieved from
www.statista.com/
statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwid
Topp, N. W., & Pawloski, B. (2002). Online data collection. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 11(2), 173–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014669514367.
Volz, E., Wejnert, C., Cameron, C., Spiller, M., Barash, V., Degani, I., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2012).
Respondent-driven sampling analysis tool (RDSAT) version 7.1, Ithaca, New York, NY: Cornell
University.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Mateus Canniatti Ponchio, Nelson Lerner Barth , Felipe Zambaldi
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution