Why should we care about preparing referee reports?

Bedeian, A. G. (2003). The manuscript review process: the proper roles of authors, referees, and editors. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4), 331–338. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492603258974

Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1652–1678. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1652 doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1652.

Berk, J. B., Harvey, C. R., & Hirshleifer, D. (2017). How to write an effective referee report and improve the scientific review process. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 231–244. Retrieved from:https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.231 doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.231.

Card, D., & DellaVigna, S. (2013). Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 144–161. Retrieved from: http://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.144 doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.144.

Chetty, R., Saez, E., & Sandor, L. (2014). What policies increase prosocial behavior? An experiment with referees at the journal of public economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 169–188. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.169 doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.169.

Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2007). Paying respect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 135–149. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.4.135 doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.4.135.

Ellison, G. (2002). The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 947–993, doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/341868. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/

Gerhardt, L. M., Dal Pai, D., Gouveia, H. G., & Azzolin, K. D. E. (2014). Peer reviewer: what commitment is that? Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, 35(2), 12–3.8.–11. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1590/1983-14470201400200001 doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-14470201400200001.

Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1086/468061 doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/468061.

Hamermesh, D. S. (1992). The young economist’s guide to professional etiquette. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(1), 169–179. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1257/jep.6.1.169 doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.6.1.169.

Hamermesh, D. S. (1994). Facts and myths about refereeing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 153–163. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/2138156 doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.153.

Hamermesh, D. S. (2013). Six decades of top economics publishing: who and how? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(1), 162–172. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.162 doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.1.162.

London, B. (Ed.) (2021). Reviewing peer review. Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(15), e021475. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021475 doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/

JAHA.121.021475.

McAfee, R. P. (2010). Edifying editing. The American Economist, 55(1), 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451005500101.

Schminke, M. (2002). From the editors. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 487–490. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2002.25891519 doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2002.25891519.

Squazzoni, F., Bravo, G., & Takacs, K. (2013). Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study. Research Policy, 42(1), 287–294. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.014 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.014.

Taylor, T. (2009). An editor’s life at the journal of economic perspectives. The American Economist, 53(1), 1–12. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40657775 doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/

Tosi, H. (2009). It’s about time!!!!: What to do about long delays in the review process. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(2), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492608330468 doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492608330468.

Treviño, L. K.(Ed.) (2008). Editor’s comments: Why review? Because reviewing is a professional responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 8–10. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.2774483