Vector competence experiments with Rocio virus and three mosquito species from the epidemic zone in Brazil

Authors

  • Carl J. Mitchell U.S. Departmente of Health and Human Services; Public Health Service; Centers for Disease Control; Division of Vector-Borne Viral Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases
  • Oswaldo Paulo Forattini Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Saúde Pública; Department of Epidemiology
  • Barry R. Miller U.S. Departmente of Health and Human Services; Public Health Service; Centers for Disease Control; Division of Vector-Borne Viral Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101986000300001

Keywords:

Encephalitis viruses^i1^sphysiol, Psorophora ferox, Aedes scapularis, Aedes serratus, Insect vectors^i1^smicrobiol, Encephalitis, epidemic^i1^stransmiss, Arbovirus infection

Abstract

First-generation progeny of field-collected Psorophora ferox, Aedes scapularis, and Aedes serratus from the Rocio encephalitis epidemic zone in S.Paulo State, Brazil, were tested for vector competency in the laboratory. Psorophora ferox and Ae. scapularis are susceptible to per os infection with Rocio virus and can transmit the virus by bite following a suitable incubation period. Oral ID50S for the two species (10(4.1) and 10(4.3) Vero cell plaque forming units, respectively) did not differ significantly. Infection rates in Ae. serratus never exceeded 36%, and, consequently, an ID50 could not be calculated for this species. It is unlikely that Ae. serratus is an epidemiologically important vector of Rocio virus. The utility of an in vitro feeding technique for demonstrating virus transmission by infected mosquitoes and difficulties encountered in working with uncolonized progeny of field-collected mosquitoes are discussed.

Downloads

Published

1986-06-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Mitchell, C. J., Forattini, O. P., & Miller, B. R. (1986). Vector competence experiments with Rocio virus and three mosquito species from the epidemic zone in Brazil . Revista De Saúde Pública, 20(3), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101986000300001