Developing strategies and quality control in the Ageing and Brain Working Study in ELSA-Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s15188787.2025059006956Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe all stages of developing strategies and quality control in the Aging and Brain Working Study linked to the Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde do Adulto (ELSA-Brasil – Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health), a prospective cohort of 15,105 civil servants (aged 35–74) followed up since 2008. METHODS: Based on the sample of participants alive at the beginning of the sample selection in September 2022 (n = 4,566) from ELSA-Brasil (Centro Investigação São Paulo), a representative sample of 2,165 individuals was calculated according to the following criteria and divided into two subsamples: (1) Sample of participants < 70 years old in Wave 3 (2017–2019) randomized according to cognitive trajectory from Wave 1 to 3, n = 1,670; (2) SuperAgers case-control sample, individuals aged ≥ 70 years in Wave 3, based on episodic memory in Wave 3, n = 495 participants (171 cases, 324 controls). The processes implemented to ensure quality control of information prior to data collection were selection of data collection instruments, training and certification of teams, preparation of a manual of definitions and standardized operating procedures, pilot studies, data collection logistics, harmonization of imaging protocols, and creation of an anti-noise device. Given the scope of the study, its multicenter nature, and the diversity of measures involved, this project required the implementation of effective quality assurance and control protocols, ensuring standardization, methodological consistency, and data integrity at all stages. RESULTS: After implementing the quality assurance and control processes, the final stages related to clinical and imaging data collection, management, and continuous monitoring of f ield activities were conducted, with weekly reports and statistical monitoring of the sample. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of systematic stages of development and quality control was fundamental to ensure the production and reliability of information from brain neuroimaging studies.
References
1. Whitney CW, Lind BK, Wahl PW. Quality assurance and quality control in longitudinal studies. Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20(1):71-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017973
2. Aquino EM, Barreto SM, Bensenor IM, Carvalho MS, Chor D, Duncan BB, et al. Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil): objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;175(4):315-24. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/aje/kwr294
3. Lotufo PA. The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil): the best science is providing health for all. Sao Paulo Med J. 2018;136(6):499-500.
4. Schmidt MI, Klag MJ, Goulart AC, Luft VC, Goulart AC, Menezes GM de S, et al. Estratégias e desenvolvimento de garantia e controle de qualidade no ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2013;47(Supl 2):105-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003889
5. Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Successful aging. Gerontologist. 1997 Aug;37(4):433-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.4.433
6. Ikram MA, Brusselle GGO, Murad SD, van Duijn CM, Franco OH, Goedegebure A, et al. The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;32(9):807-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0321-4
7. Solomon A, Kivipelto M, Molinuevo JL, Tom B, Ritchie CW; EPAD Consortium. European Prevention of Alzheimer’s Dementia Longitudinal Cohort Study (EPAD LCS): study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb;8(12):e021017. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021017
8. Lorenzini L, Ingala S, Wink AM, Kuijer JPA, Wottschel V, Dijsselhof M, et al. The Open-Access European Prevention of Alzheimer’s Dementia (EPAD) MRI dataset and processing workflow. Neuroimage Clin. 2022; 35:103106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103106
9. Rogalski EJ, Gefen T, Shi J, Samimi M, Bigio E, Weintraub S, et al. Youthful memory capacity in old brains: anatomic and genetic clues from the Northwestern SuperAging Project. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013;25(1):29-36. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00300
10. Garo-Pascual M, Gaser C, Zhang L, Tohka J, Medina M, Strange BA. Brain structure and phenotypic profile of superagers compared with age-matched older adults: a longitudinal analysis from the Vallecas Project. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2023 Aug;4(8):e374-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(23)00079-X
11. Maccora J, Peters R, Anstey KJ. Gender Differences in Superior-memory SuperAgers and Associated Factors in an Australian Cohort. J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Apr;40(4):433-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820902943
12. Park CH, Kim BR, Park HK, Lim SM, Kim E, Jeong JH, et al. Predicting superagers by machine learning classification based on the functional brain connectome using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex. 2022 Sep;32(19):4183-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab474
13. Gefen T, Shaw E, Whitney K, Martersteck A, Stratton J, Rademaker A, et al. Longitudinal neuropsychological performance of cognitive SuperAgers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Aug;62(8):1598-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12967
14. Powell A, Page ZA, Close JCT, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H. Defining exceptional cognition in older adults: A systematic review of cognitive super-ageing. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;38(12):e6034. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.6034
15. Baccaro A, Segre A, Wang YP, Brunoni AR, Santos IS, Lotufo PA, et al. Validation of the BrazilianPortuguese version of the Modified Telephone Interview for cognitive status among stroke patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Sep;15(9):1118-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12409
16. Dutra MC, Ribeiro RDS, Pinheiro SB, Melo GF, Carvalho GA. Accuracy and reliability of the Pfeffer Questionnaire for the Brazilian elderly population. Dement Neuropsychol. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):176-83. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642015DN92000012
17. Aprahamian I, Lin SM, Suemoto CK, Apolinario D, Cezar NOC, Elmadjian SM, et al. Feasibility and Factor Structure of the FRAIL Scale in Older Adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr;18(4):367.e11-367.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.067
18. Goulart AC, Bismarchi D, Rienzo M, Syllos DH, Wang YP. Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR-5): a useful screening tool for anger in the general population. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;25(4):421-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2020.1821893
19. Carvalho HW, Andreoli SB, Lara DR, Patrick CJ, Quintana MI, Bressan RA, et al. Structural validity and reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): evidence from a large Brazilian community sample. Braz J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;35(2):169-72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2012-0957
20. ACF Monnerat, LS de Faria, M Silvia, APC de Mello, Landeira-Fernandez J. Avaliação da estrutura fatorial da Escala de Ansiedade-Traço do IDATE. Aval Psicol. 2006 [citado 2025 out 8];5(2):217-24. Disponível em: https://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712006000200011
21. Lima Osório F, Vilela Mendes A, Crippa JA, Loureiro SR. Study of the discriminative validity of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 in a sample of Brazilian women in the context of primary health care. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2009 Jul;45(3):216-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6163.2009.00224.x
22. Cornelius BL, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Brouwer S. The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants. BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb;13:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-128
23. Chor D, Alves MG, Giatti L, Cade NV, Nunes MA, Molina Mdel C, et al. Questionário do ELSA-Brasil: desafios na elaboração de instrumento multidimensional. Rev Saúde Pública. 2013 Jun;47 Suppl 2:27-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003835
24. Camelo LV, Giatti L, Barreto SM. Subjective social status, self-rated health and tobacco smoking: Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). J Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;19(11):1388-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313490772
25. Molina Mdel C, Benseñor IM, Cardoso LO, Velasquez-Melendez G, Drehmer M, Pereira TS, et al. Reprodutibilidade e validade relativa do Questionário de Frequência Alimentar do ELSA-Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2013 Feb;29(2):379-89. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2013000200024
26. Santos SM, Griep RH, Cardoso LO, Alves MG, Fonseca MJ, Giatti L, et al. Adaptação transcultural e confiabilidade de medidas de características autorreferidas de vizinhança no ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2013 Jun;47 Suppl 2:122-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003871
27. Griep RH, Santos SM, Cardoso LO, Fonseca MJ, Alves MG, Souto EP, et al. Capital social no ELSA-Brasil: confiabilidade teste-reteste do Resource Generator scale. Rev Saúde Pública. 2013 Jun;47 Suppl 2:131-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003805
28. Pinto KA, Menezes GM, Griep RH, Lima KT, Almeida MC, Aquino EM. Work-family conflict and time use: psychometric assessment of an instrument in ELSA-Brazil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2016;50:39. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050005892
29. Souto EP, Vasconcelos AG, Chor D, Reichenheim ME, Griep RH. Validade da estrutura fatorial da escala de capital social utilizada na linha de base no ELSA-Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2016;32(7):S0102-311X2016000704002. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00101515
30. O’Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Thomas M. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: The Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP 5332, and Nissei DS-175. Blood Pr Monitor. 1996;1(1):55-61.
31. Mill JG, Pinto K, Griep RH, Goulart A, Foppa M, Lotufo PA, et al. Aferições e exames clínicos realizados nos participantes do ELSA-Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2013 Jun;47 Suppl 2:54-62. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003851
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alessandra Vanessa Lopes Quidim, Raphael Beuttler, Helena Mendes Eloi, Maria Concepción García Otaduy, José Gilvam Araújo Lima Júnior, Murillo Mariotto Teixeira, Carlos Eduardo de Lima Moraes Dardis, Khallil Taverna Chaim, Adriana Bastos Conforto, Claudia da Costa Leite, Carolina de Medeiros Rimkus, Claudia Kimie Suemoto, Angelita Gomes Souza, Itamar Souza Santos, Paulo Andrade Lotufo, Isabela Judith Martins Benseñor, Alessandra Carvalho Goulart
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Grant numbers 2020/09468-9
