Pragmatic criteria of the definition of neonatal near miss: a comparative study

Authors

  • Pauline Lorena Kale Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva. Área de Epidemiologia e Bioestatística
  • Maria Helena Prado de Mello Jorge Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Epidemiologia
  • Ruy Laurenti Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Epidemiologia
  • Sandra Costa Fonseca Universidade Federal Fluminense. Instituto de Saúde Coletiva. Departamento de Epidemiologia e Bioestatística
  • Kátia Silveira da Silva Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira. Departamento de Epidemiologia Clínica

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051006587

Keywords:

Near miss, classification, Infant Mortality. Birth Wieght, Infant, Premature Apgar score.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the validity of the pragmatic criteria of the definitions of neonatal near miss, extending them throughout the infant period, and to estimate the indicators of perinatal care in public maternity hospitals. METHODS: A cohort of live births from six maternity hospitals in the municipalities of São Paulo, Niterói, and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was carried out in 2011. We carried out interviews and checked prenatal cards and medical records. We compared the pragmatic criteria (birth weight, gestational age, and 5’ Apgar score) of the definitions of near miss of Pileggi et al., Pileggi-Castro et al., Souza et al., and Silva et al. We calculated sensitivity, specificity (gold standard: infant mortality), percentage of deaths among newborns with life-threatening conditions, and rates of near miss, mortality, and severe outcomes per 1,000 live births. RESULTS: A total 7,315 newborns were analyzed (completeness of information > 99%). The sensitivity of the definition of Pileggi-Castro et al. was higher, resulting in a higher number of cases of near miss, Souza et al. presented lower value, and Pileggi et al. and de Silva et al. presented intermediate values. There is an increase in sensitivity when the period goes from 0–6 to 0–27 days, and there is a decrease when it goes to 0–364 days. Specificities were high (≥ 97%) and above sensitivities (54% to 77%). One maternity hospital in São Paulo and one in Niterói presented, respectively, the lowest and highest rates of infant mortality, near miss, and frequency of births with life-threatening conditions, regardless of the definition. CONCLUSIONS: The definitions of near miss based exclusively on pragmatic criteria are valid and can be used for monitoring purposes. Based on the perinatal literature, the cutoff points adopted by Silva et al. were more appropriate. Periodic studies could apply a more complete definition, incorporating clinical, laboratory, and management criteria, including congenital anomalies predictive of infant mortality.

Published

2017-12-04

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Kale, P. L., Jorge, M. H. P. de M., Laurenti, R., Fonseca, S. C., & Silva, K. S. da. (2017). Pragmatic criteria of the definition of neonatal near miss: a comparative study. Revista De Saúde Pública, 51, 111. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051006587