Rating of the structures of agreement and disagreement in reliability studies

Authors

  • Eduardo Freitas da Silva Universidade de Brasília
  • Maurício Gomes Pereira Universidade de Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101998000400012

Keywords:

Log-linear models^i2^sPublic hea

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To complement the data of a previous research concerning the evaluation of the lifetime risk of radiation-induced cancer due to the ingestion of 226Ra, 228Ra and 222Rn in mineral spring waters from a natural highly radioactive region of Brazil. The study was performed to evaluate the lifetime risk of radiation-induced cancer due to the ingestion of 238U and 234 U in the same spring waters. METHOD: It is assumed that the risk coefficient for natural U isotopes is the same as for the 226Ra-induced bone sarcomas and that the equilibrium for skeletal content is 25 times the daily ingestion of 226Ra, but 11 times the daily ingestion of long-lived uranium isotopes. Waters samples were collected seasonally over a period of one year at all the spring sites used by the local population of Águas da Prata, S. Paulo State (Brazil). RESULTS: Concentrations ranging from 2.0 to 28.4 mBq/L and from 4.7 to 143 mBq/L were observed for 238U and 234U, respectively. Based upon the measured concentrations the lifetime risk due to the ingestion of uranium isotopes was estimated. A total of 0.3 uranium-induced cancers per 10(6) exposed persons was predicted, suggesting that chronic ingestion of uranium at the levels observed at these springs will result in an incremental increase of fatal cancers of 0.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: By taking into account the uncertainties in evaluating the carcinogenic effects, it can be concluded that virtually no cancer would be expected from the ingestion of uranium in the mineral spring waters analyzed.

Published

1998-08-01

Issue

Section

Current Comments

How to Cite

Silva, E. F. da, & Pereira, M. G. (1998). Rating of the structures of agreement and disagreement in reliability studies . Revista De Saúde Pública, 32(4), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101998000400012