Knowledge adequacy on contraceptives among women in Brazil

Authors

  • Ximena Espejo Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Centro de Assistência Integral à Saúde; Unidade de Reprodução Humana
  • Maria Alice Tsunechiro Universidade de São Paulo; Escola de Enfermagem
  • Maria José Duarte Osis Centro de Pesquisas Materno Infantis de Campinas
  • Graciana Alves Duarte Centro de Pesquisas Materno Infantis de Campinas
  • Luis Bahamondese Unicamp; Faculdade de Ciências; Departamento de Tocoginecologia
  • Maria Helena de Sousa Centro de Pesquisas Materno Infantis de Campinas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102003000500006

Keywords:

Contraception, Knowledge, attitudes, practice, Women's health^i2^ssocioeconomic fact, Health education, Women's health services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An analysis of secondary data was carried out to evaluate the knowledge adequacy on contraceptives and its association with socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. METHODS: The sample consisted of 472 women from the city of Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Chi-square test was used to evaluate differences among variables and logistic regression was performed to identify independent variables associated with knowledge adequacy (evaluated through a score). RESULTS: Of the total, 47.6% women reached a score higher than six, which was classified as an adequate knowledge on contraceptives. Higher schooling and better socioeconomic status were associated to higher scores of knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that it is necessary to improve women's education in general, and on contraceptive methods specifically. In addition, professionals working in public health services should be capacitated to provide contraceptives as well as adequate information on contraceptive methods.

Published

2003-10-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Espejo, X., Tsunechiro, M. A., Osis, M. J. D., Duarte, G. A., Bahamondese, L., & Sousa, M. H. de. (2003). Knowledge adequacy on contraceptives among women in Brazil . Revista De Saúde Pública, 37(5), 583-590. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102003000500006